Paper · 2012 · Annals of Applied Biology

Baseline sensitivity and efficacy of thifluzamide in Rhizoctonia solani

Y. Chen; A.‐F. Zhang; W.‐X. Wang; et al.

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
83
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Thifluzamide is a SDHI (succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor) fungicide, which interferes with succinate ubiquinone reductase in the mitochondrial electron transport chain of fungi. Presently, jinggangmycin is the major fungicide extensively used for the control of rice sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani and resistance to jinggangmycin was first reported to occur in China. A total of 128 isolates of R. solani from Anhui Province of China were characterised for the baseline sensitivity to thifluzamide. The isolates were very sensitive to thifluzamide and the baseline sensitivity curve was unimodal with an average EC 50 value of 0.058 ± 0.012 µg mL −1 . However, EC 50 values of boscalid (another SDHI fungicide) for inhibition of mycelial growth of 22 arbitrarily selected R. solani isolates ranged from 1.89 to 2.68 µg mL −1 . Thifluzamide applied at 110 µg mL −1 exhibited excellent protective and curative activity against rice sheath blight and provided 81.1–91.0% protective or curative control efficacy. In field trials in 2010 and 2011, control efficacies of thifluzamide at 82 g.a.i ha −1 15 and 30 days after second application were 84.2% and 86.7%, respectively, suggesting excellent activity against sheath blight. There was a statistically significant difference in the efficacy between thifluzamide and boscalid or jinggangmycin. These results suggested that thifluzamide should be a good alternative fungicide to jinggangmycin for the control of rice sheath blight.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thifluzamide provided 81.1–91.0% protective or curative control of rice sheath blight.

Treatment
Thifluzamide applied at 110 µg mL −1e0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Outcome
protective or curative control efficacye0
Direction
excellente0
Value
81.1–91.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thifluzamide applied at 110 µg mL −1 exhibited excellent protective and curative activity against rice sheath blight and provided 81.1–91.0% protective or curative control efficacy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–1020 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field thifluzamide control efficacy was 84.2% at 15 days after the second application.

Treatment
thifluzamide at 82 g.a.i ha −1e0
Outcome
control efficaciese0
Value
84.2%e0
Qualifier
15 and 30 days after second applicatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In field trials in 2010 and 2011, control efficacies of thifluzamide at 82 g.a.i ha −1 15 and 30 days after second application were 84.2% and 86.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“control of rice sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field thifluzamide control efficacy was 86.7% at 30 days after the second application.

Treatment
thifluzamide at 82 g.a.i ha −1e0
Outcome
control efficaciese0
Value
86.7%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In field trials in 2010 and 2011, control efficacies of thifluzamide at 82 g.a.i ha −1 15 and 30 days after second application were 84.2% and 86.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“control of rice sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thifluzamide efficacy differed significantly from boscalid or jinggangmycin efficacy.

Treatment
thifluzamidee0
Outcome
efficacye0
Comparator
boscalid or jinggangmycine0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a statistically significant difference in the efficacy between thifluzamide and boscalid or jinggangmycin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1353 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“control of rice sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–310 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed thifluzamide as an alternative to jinggangmycin for rice sheath blight.

Treatment
thifluzamidee0
Outcome
control of rice sheath blighte0
Comparator
jinggangmycine0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thifluzamide should be a good alternative fungicide to jinggangmycin for the control of rice sheath blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1490 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑

thifluzamide · Rhizoctonia solani · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

thifluzamide · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.