Abstract
Two potted experiments were conducted at the screen]house of the Department of Crop, Soil and Pest Management of the Federal University of Technology, Akure to investigate the effects of lime and different levels of organicmanure amendment on acid]clay soil, Okra growth and yield parameters.The first experiment consisted of six treatments and a control; choppedTithonia diversifolia leaves were applied on limed soil (100g lime kg]1 Soil) at0g, 6.75g, 13.5g, 20.25g, 27.0g and 33.75g kg]1 Soil. The second experimentalso consisted of six treatments and a control; poultry manure was appliedon limed soil (100g lime kg]1 Soil) at 0g, 6.75g, 13.5g, 20.25g, 27.0g and33.75g kg]1 Soil. They were arranged in Complete Randomized Design. Soilsamples were collected at the 2nd, 4th, and 6th, week after planting and subjected to chemical analysis. Okra growth and yield data were collected and statistical analyses carried out using the SPSS Package and means compared with Duncan Multiple Range Test (DMRT) at 5% level of probability. The result of the study showed that soil pH, OC, OM, N, P, K, Ca, Na, Mg and CEC increased with lime application and with increases in rate of Tithonia leaves or poultry manure application. There were no significant differences in most of the soil parameters considered in Tithonia and poultry manure applied at 27.0g and 33.75 g kg ]1 soil. Growth parameters showed no significant differences for the two experiments except with regards to number of leaves in Tithonia application. Application of 33.75g Tithonia kg]1 gave the highest Okra pod weight for Tithonia treated soil while the application of 27g poultry manure kg]1 gave highest Okra weight for poultry manure treated soil.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Lime and increasing Tithonia leaf or poultry manure application increased soil pH, OC and OM.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“soil pH, OC, OM, N, P, K, Ca, Na, Mg and CEC increased with lime application and with increases in rate of Tithonia leaves or poultry manure application”
Claim · model-written summary
Lime and increasing organic amendment rates increased soil N, P and K.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“soil pH, OC, OM, N, P, K, Ca, Na, Mg and CEC increased with lime application and with increases in rate of Tithonia leaves or poultry manure application”
Claim · model-written summary
Lime and increasing organic amendment rates increased soil Ca, Na and Mg.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“soil pH, OC, OM, N, P, K, Ca, Na, Mg and CEC increased with lime application and with increases in rate of Tithonia leaves or poultry manure application”
Claim · model-written summary
Lime and increasing organic amendment rates increased soil CEC.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“soil pH, OC, OM, N, P, K, Ca, Na, Mg and CEC increased with lime application and with increases in rate of Tithonia leaves or poultry manure application”
Claim · model-written summary
Most soil parameters did not differ significantly between the two highest organic amendment rates.
- Treatment
- Tithonia and poultry manuree0
- Outcome
- soil parameterse0
- Direction
- no significant differencese0
- Qualifier
- 27.0g and 33.75 g kg ]1 soile0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“There were no significant differences in most of the soil parameters considered in Tithonia and poultry manure applied at 27.0g and 33.75 g kg ]1 soil.”
Claim · model-written summary
Okra growth parameters showed no significant differences except leaf number under Tithonia application.
- Taxon
- Okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- Tithonia applicatione0
- Outcome
- Growth parameterse0
- Direction
- no significant differencese0
- Qualifier
- except with regards to number of leavese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Growth parameters showed no significant differences for the two experiments except with regards to number of leaves in Tithonia application.”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying 33.75g Tithonia kg]1 gave the highest Okra pod weight among Tithonia treatments.
- Taxon
- Okra
Abelmoschus esculentuse0 - Treatment
- 33.75g Tithonia kg]1e0
- Outcome
- Okra pod weighte0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- Tithonia treated soile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Application of 33.75g Tithonia kg]1 gave the highest Okra pod weight for Tithonia treated soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying 27g poultry manure kg]1 gave the highest Okra weight among poultry manure treatments.
- Taxon
- Okra
Abelmoschus esculentuse0 - Treatment
- 27g poultry manure kg]1e0
- Outcome
- Okra weighte0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- poultry manure treated soile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the application of 27g poultry manure kg]1 gave highest Okra weight for poultry manure treated soil.”
The same questions in other papers
Tithonia · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
fertilization · organism · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.