Paper · 2014 · Nongye huanjing kexue xuebao

Effects of Biochar Amendment on Soil Water and Nutrient Utilization Efficiencies and Tomato Growth

LI Chang-jia

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Biochar added to soil has the potential to hold water and retain nutrients. However, the effects of biochar on soil water and nutrient utilization efficiencies were not well understood. A field experiment was carried out to examine changes of physical properties and water and nutrient bearing capability of sandy loam under different application rates of biochar. The experiment had 5 treatments with 3 replication, including no biochar(CK), 10 t·hm-2(T1), 20 t·hm-2(T2), 40 t·hm-2(T3)and 60 t·hm-2of biochar(T4). Application of biochar reduced soil bulk density, but increased soil porosity and moisture content. Such effects were found to be the greatest in the T4 treatment, in which bulk density was reduced by 23% in 0~10 cm, and by 30% in 0~20 cm, while the porosity was increased by 14% in 0~10 cm, and by19% in 0~20 cm as compared with the control. Biochar addition enhanced soil water and nutrient utilization efficiency by at least 27.7% and87.4%, respectively. Also, biochar improved tomato growth and yield, with the greatest effects observed in the T3 treatment, a 56.1% increment over the control. In conclusion, biochar could improve soil physical properties, increase utilization efficiency of soil water and nutrients. The optimum biochar rate would be 40 t·hm-2for sandy loam.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar reduced soil bulk density.

Treatment
Application of biochare0
Outcome
soil bulk densitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of biochar reduced soil bulk density, but increased soil porosity and moisture content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–614 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar increased soil porosity and moisture content.

Treatment
Application of biochare0
Outcome
soil porosity and moisture contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of biochar reduced soil bulk density, but increased soil porosity and moisture content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–614 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 reduced bulk density by 23% at 0–10 cm.

Outcome
bulk densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
23%e0
Qualifier
0~10 cme0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bulk density was reduced by 23% in 0~10 cm, and by 30% in 0~20 cm, while the porosity was increased by 14% in 0~10 cm, and by19% in 0~20 cm as compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 reduced bulk density by 30% at 0–20 cm.

Outcome
bulk densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
30%e0
Qualifier
0~20 cme0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bulk density was reduced by 23% in 0~10 cm, and by 30% in 0~20 cm, while the porosity was increased by 14% in 0~10 cm, and by19% in 0~20 cm as compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 increased porosity by 14% at 0–10 cm.

Outcome
porositye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
14%e0
Qualifier
0~10 cme0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bulk density was reduced by 23% in 0~10 cm, and by 30% in 0~20 cm, while the porosity was increased by 14% in 0~10 cm, and by19% in 0~20 cm as compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 increased porosity by 19% at 0–20 cm.

Outcome
porositye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19%e0
Qualifier
0~20 cme0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bulk density was reduced by 23% in 0~10 cm, and by 30% in 0~20 cm, while the porosity was increased by 14% in 0~10 cm, and by19% in 0~20 cm as compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar enhanced soil water utilization efficiency by at least 27.7%.

Treatment
Biochar additione0
Outcome
soil watere0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
27.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biochar addition enhanced soil water and nutrient utilization efficiency by at least 27.7% and87.4%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar enhanced nutrient utilization efficiency by at least 87.4%.

Treatment
Biochar additione0
Outcome
nutrient utilization efficiencye0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
87.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biochar addition enhanced soil water and nutrient utilization efficiency by at least 27.7% and87.4%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar improved tomato growth and yield, with a 56.1% maximum increment under T3.

Treatment
T3 treatmente0
Outcome
tomato growth and yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
56.1%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochar improved tomato growth and yield, with the greatest effects observed in the T3 treatment, a 56.1% increment over the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1112 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identified 40 t·hm-2 as the optimum biochar rate for sandy loam.

Outcome
optimum biochar ratee0
Value
40 t·hm-2e0
Qualifier
sandy loame0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimum biochar rate would be 40 t·hm-2for sandy loam.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1295 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑

biochar · nutrient: efficiency · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

biochar · soil: physics · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

biochar · quality: grain · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.