Paper · 2011

Effect of Reduced Solar Irradiance on Leaf Photosynthsis, Membrane Lipid Peroxidation, and Photosynthate Accumulation of Winter Wheat

Jingxin Xu

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In recent years, the increase of aerosol loading has resulted in obviously global dimming of solar light, which can adversely affect the growth and physiological properties of crops. In order to investigate the effects of reduced solar irradiance on photosynthsis, membrane lipid peroxidation and photosynthate accumulation characteristics of winter wheat cultivar, we conducted a field experiment in Nanjing area by using the Triticum aestivum L.(cv.Yang mai 13) as the experimental plants. Starting from jointing to maturity, the plants were subjected to 5 shading treatments, i.e.100%, 60%(T1), 40%(T2), 20%(T3) and 15%(T4) of total incident solar irradiation, with the first one as control(CK). Results indicated that 60%~15% of natural solar irradiance significantly restrained the net photosynthetic rate of winter wheat, which was decreased by 15.8%~70.1% of CK. However, the pigment contents(Chlorophyll a, Chlorophyll b and carotenoid) increased under the reduced solar irradiance treatments, and the increment of Chlorophyll b was more obviously. With decreasing intensity of solar irradiance was, significant reduction of membrane lipid peroxidation and cell membrane permeability was observed, and the lower the solar irradiance was, the stronger the impact was. When the solar irradiance decreased to 60%~15% of natural light, the contents of soluble sugar and soluble protein were respectively decreased by 32.22%~76.45% and 19.02%~48.12%, as compared to CK. However, under the same solar irradiance the total free amino acid increased by as much as 47.46%~177.87% of CK. In conclusion, reduced solar irradiance could significantly decrease the leaf photosynthesis of winter wheat, increase the contents of leaf photosynthetic pigments, restrain the membrane lipid peroxidation. As a result, the accumulation of sugar and protein was impaired, which would further influence the yield and nutritional quality of crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading reduced winter wheat net photosynthetic rate by 15.8%~70.1% relative to control.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
60%~15% of natural solar irradiancee0
Outcome
net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
15.8%~70.1%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“60%~15% of natural solar irradiance significantly restrained the net photosynthetic rate of winter wheat, which was decreased by 15.8%~70.1% of CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–868 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irradiance increased chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoid contents, with a larger chlorophyll b increase.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
reduced solar irradiance treatmentse0
Outcome
pigment contents(Chlorophyll a, Chlorophyll b and carotenoid)e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
increment of Chlorophyll b was more obviouslye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the pigment contents(Chlorophyll a, Chlorophyll b and carotenoid) increased under the reduced solar irradiance treatments, and the increment of Chlorophyll b was more obviously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower irradiance reduced membrane lipid peroxidation and cell membrane permeability, more strongly at lower irradiance.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
decreasing intensity of solar irradiancee0
Outcome
membrane lipid peroxidation and cell membrane permeabilitye0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
the lower the solar irradiance was, the stronger the impact wase0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With decreasing intensity of solar irradiance was, significant reduction of membrane lipid peroxidation and cell membrane permeability was observed, and the lower the solar irradiance was, the stronger the impact was”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1273 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irradiance decreased soluble sugar content by 32.22%~76.45% versus CK.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
solar irradiance decreased to 60%~15% of natural lighte0
Outcome
soluble sugare0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
32.22%~76.45%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the solar irradiance decreased to 60%~15% of natural light, the contents of soluble sugar and soluble protein were respectively decreased by 32.22%~76.45% and 19.02%~48.12%, as compared to CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1471 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irradiance decreased soluble protein content by 19.02%~48.12% versus CK.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
solar irradiance decreased to 60%~15% of natural lighte0
Outcome
soluble proteine0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
19.02%~48.12%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the solar irradiance decreased to 60%~15% of natural light, the contents of soluble sugar and soluble protein were respectively decreased by 32.22%~76.45% and 19.02%~48.12%, as compared to CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1471 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irradiance increased total free amino acid by 47.46%~177.87% of CK.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
same solar irradiancee0
Outcome
total free amino acide0
Direction
increasede0
Value
47.46%~177.87%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under the same solar irradiance the total free amino acid increased by as much as 47.46%~177.87% of CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1584 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–133 · show in text ↑

light · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

light · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 16 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.