Abstract

'Pawnee' wheat ( Triticutn aestivum L.) seedlings were grown under lighting of low (7,500 lux) or high (15,600 lux) intensities, blue (380‐470 mu) or red (680‐740 mu) qualities, and short (8‐hr) or long (16‐hr) nhotoperiods. A single level of N was supplied in graded ratios of nitrate and ammonium in solution cultures. In leaf blades, high light intensity had no consistent effect on nitrate reductase (NR) activity, increased soluble protein, and decreased nitrate. Blue light increased NR activity and soluble protein but decreased nitrate as compared with red light. The long photoperiod increased NR activity and decreased nitrate and soluble protein as compared with the short photoperiod. The light treatments had little effect on roots except for an accumulation of nitrate under the short photoperiod. NR activity and nitrate content in leaf blades and roots increased under all light treatments as the nitrate‐to‐ammonium ratio in the nutrient solution increased, and soluble protein content decreased slightly.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High light intensity had no consistent effect on wheat leaf nitrate reductase activity.

Organ / stage
leaf bladese0
Treatment
high light intensitye0
Outcome
nitrate reductase (NR) activitye0
Direction
no consistent effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In leaf blades, high light intensity had no consistent effect on nitrate reductase (NR) activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–417 · show in text ↑
t0

“Influence of Intensity, Quality, and Duration of Light on Nitrogen Reduction and Assimilation in Wheat1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High light increased wheat leaf soluble protein.

Organ / stage
Wheatt0
Treatment
high light intensitye0
Outcome
soluble proteine0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high light intensity had no consistent effect on nitrate reductase (NR) activity, increased soluble protein, and decreased nitrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–467 · show in text ↑
t0

“Influence of Intensity, Quality, and Duration of Light on Nitrogen Reduction and Assimilation in Wheat1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High light decreased wheat leaf nitrate.

Treatment
high light intensitye0
Outcome
nitratee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high light intensity had no consistent effect on nitrate reductase (NR) activity, increased soluble protein, and decreased nitrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–467 · show in text ↑
t0

“Influence of Intensity, Quality, and Duration of Light on Nitrogen Reduction and Assimilation in Wheat1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue light increased wheat leaf nitrate reductase activity and soluble protein relative to red light.

Treatment
Blue lighte0
Outcome
NR activity and soluble proteine0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
red lighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Blue light increased NR activity and soluble protein but decreased nitrate as compared with red light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–570 · show in text ↑
t0

“Influence of Intensity, Quality, and Duration of Light on Nitrogen Reduction and Assimilation in Wheat1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue light decreased wheat leaf nitrate relative to red light.

Treatment
Blue lighte0
Outcome
nitratee0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
red lighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Blue light increased NR activity and soluble protein but decreased nitrate as compared with red light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–570 · show in text ↑
t0

“Influence of Intensity, Quality, and Duration of Light on Nitrogen Reduction and Assimilation in Wheat1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long photoperiod increased wheat leaf nitrate reductase activity relative to short photoperiod.

Treatment
long photoperiode0
Outcome
NR activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
short photoperiode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The long photoperiod increased NR activity and decreased nitrate and soluble protein as compared with the short photoperiod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–695 · show in text ↑
t0

“Influence of Intensity, Quality, and Duration of Light on Nitrogen Reduction and Assimilation in Wheat1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long photoperiod decreased wheat leaf nitrate and soluble protein relative to short photoperiod.

Treatment
long photoperiode0
Outcome
nitrate and soluble proteine0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
short photoperiode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The long photoperiod increased NR activity and decreased nitrate and soluble protein as compared with the short photoperiod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–695 · show in text ↑
t0

“Influence of Intensity, Quality, and Duration of Light on Nitrogen Reduction and Assimilation in Wheat1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light treatments had little effect on wheat roots except nitrate accumulation under short photoperiod.

Treatment
light treatmentse0
Outcome
rootse0
Direction
little effecte0
Qualifier
except for an accumulation of nitrate under the short photoperiode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The light treatments had little effect on roots except for an accumulation of nitrate under the short photoperiod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“Influence of Intensity, Quality, and Duration of Light on Nitrogen Reduction and Assimilation in Wheat1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short photoperiod led to nitrate accumulation in wheat roots.

Treatment
short photoperiode0
Outcome
nitratee0
Direction
accumulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an accumulation of nitrate under the short photoperiod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“Influence of Intensity, Quality, and Duration of Light on Nitrogen Reduction and Assimilation in Wheat1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–103 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrate-to-ammonium ratio increased nitrate reductase activity and nitrate content in wheat leaves and roots under all light treatments.

Organ / stage
leaf blades and rootse0
Treatment
nitrate‐to‐ammonium ratio in the nutrient solutione0
Outcome
NR activity and nitrate contente0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NR activity and nitrate content in leaf blades and roots increased under all light treatments as the nitrate‐to‐ammonium ratio in the nutrient solution increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“Influence of Intensity, Quality, and Duration of Light on Nitrogen Reduction and Assimilation in Wheat1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–103 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrate-to-ammonium ratio slightly decreased wheat soluble protein content.

Treatment
Lightt0
Outcome
soluble protein contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soluble protein content decreased slightly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“Influence of Intensity, Quality, and Duration of Light on Nitrogen Reduction and Assimilation in Wheat1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–103 · show in text ↑

light · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

light · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.