Abstract
The influences of different cultivation patterns under ridge plowing on maize yield effect have been conducted comparatively. The results showed that conservation tillage patterns can increase production obviously, of which the treatment of B1, B2 and B3 can be increased to12%, 13.6% and 7.8% compared to CK. Dry matter accumulation quantity and plant highness of conservation tillage patterns are lower than traditional tillage in primary growth stage, which are exceeded after jointing stage. The maximal dry matter accumulation quantity of conservation tillage patterns are appeared B2B1B3. The orderliness degree of plant highness of different tillage patterns is appeared B3CKB1B2. The advantage of grain filling speed among conservation tillage patterns is showed after pollination15d.The spike characters such as number of rows and numbers of grain of conservation tillage patterns have advantage over traditional tillage, of which B2 is higher than that of CK 0.85 and 1.40 per centage.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment B1 under conservation tillage increased maize production by 12% compared with CK.
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Maize”
e0“conservation tillage patterns can increase production obviously, of which the treatment of B1, B2 and B3 can be increased to12%, 13.6% and 7.8% compared to CK”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment B2 under conservation tillage increased maize production by 13.6% compared with CK.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Maize”
e0“conservation tillage patterns can increase production obviously, of which the treatment of B1, B2 and B3 can be increased to12%, 13.6% and 7.8% compared to CK”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment B3 under conservation tillage increased maize production by 7.8% compared with CK.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Maize”
e0“conservation tillage patterns can increase production obviously, of which the treatment of B1, B2 and B3 can be increased to12%, 13.6% and 7.8% compared to CK”
Claim · model-written summary
Dry matter accumulation and plant height under conservation tillage were lower than under traditional tillage in the primary growth stage.
- Organ / stage
- primary growth stagee0
- Treatment
- conservation tillage patternse0
- Outcome
- Dry matter accumulation quantity and plant highnesse0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- traditional tillagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Maize”
e0“Dry matter accumulation quantity and plant highness of conservation tillage patterns are lower than traditional tillage in primary growth stage, which are exceeded after jointing stage”
Claim · model-written summary
Dry matter accumulation and plant height under conservation tillage exceeded those under traditional tillage after the jointing stage.
- Organ / stage
- jointing stagee0
- Treatment
- conservation tillage patternse0
- Outcome
- Dry matter accumulation quantity and plant highnesse0
- Direction
- exceedede0
- Comparator
- traditional tillagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Maize”
e0“Dry matter accumulation quantity and plant highness of conservation tillage patterns are lower than traditional tillage in primary growth stage, which are exceeded after jointing stage”
Claim · model-written summary
The maximal dry matter accumulation under conservation tillage patterns was in the order B2, B1, B3.
- Treatment
- conservation tillage patternse0
- Outcome
- maximal dry matter accumulation quantitye0
- Direction
- maximale0
- Qualifier
- B2B1B3e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Maize”
e0“The maximal dry matter accumulation quantity of conservation tillage patterns are appeared B2B1B3”
Claim · model-written summary
The order of plant height among tillage patterns was B3, CK, B1, B2.
- Treatment
- different tillage patternse0
- Outcome
- orderliness degree of plant highnesse0
- Qualifier
- B3CKB1B2e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Maize”
e0“The orderliness degree of plant highness of different tillage patterns is appeared B3CKB1B2”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain filling speed had an advantage among conservation tillage patterns after pollination.
- Organ / stage
- pollination15de0
- Treatment
- conservation tillage patternse0
- Outcome
- grain filling speede0
- Direction
- advantagee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Maize”
e0“The advantage of grain filling speed among conservation tillage patterns is showed after pollination15d”
Claim · model-written summary
Spike characters such as number of rows and grain number under conservation tillage had an advantage over traditional tillage.
- Treatment
- conservation tillage patternse0
- Outcome
- spike characters such as number of rows and numbers of graine0
- Direction
- advantagee0
- Comparator
- traditional tillagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Maize”
e0“The spike characters such as number of rows and numbers of grain of conservation tillage patterns have advantage over traditional tillage, of which B2 is higher than that of CK 0.85 and 1.40 per centage”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment B2 was higher than CK in spike characters by 0.85 and 1.40 percentage.
- Treatment
- B2e0
- Outcome
- spike characterse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 0.85 and 1.40 per centagee0
- Comparator
- CKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Maize”
e0“The spike characters such as number of rows and numbers of grain of conservation tillage patterns have advantage over traditional tillage, of which B2 is higher than that of CK 0.85 and 1.40 per centage”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.