Abstract
Abstract Six cultures of Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. were exposed to 3 doses of ozone (O 3 ) at 3 ages. Cultivars exposed to O 3 at 2 weeks age ranked differently in sensitivity based on foliar injury than cultivars exposed at 4 and 6 weeks. Cultivars were more sensitive to O 3 at 4 than at 6 weeks but sensitivity rankings based on foliar injury were similar. The highest O 3 dose significantly inhibited the growth of all cultivars, except ‘Heinz 1439’ at 6 weeks. Cultivar rankings based on average percent change in growth from control plants were more similar at 4 and 6 weeks compared with 2 weeks.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Tomato cultivars exposed to ozone at 2 weeks of age ranked differently in sensitivity based on foliar injury than those exposed at 4 and 6 weeks.
- Taxon
- Lycopersicon esculentum
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- O 3 at 2 weeks agee1
- Outcome
- sensitivity based on foliar injurye1
- Comparator
- 4 and 6 weekse1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Six cultures of Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.”
e1“Cultivars exposed to O 3 at 2 weeks age ranked differently in sensitivity based on foliar injury than cultivars exposed at 4 and 6 weeks”
Claim · model-written summary
Tomato cultivars were more sensitive to ozone at 4 weeks than at 6 weeks.
- Taxon
- Lycopersicon esculentumSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- O 3e2
- Outcome
- sensitivee2
- Direction
- moree2
- Comparator
- 6 weekse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Six cultures of Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.”
e2“Cultivars were more sensitive to O 3 at 4 than at 6 weeks but sensitivity rankings based on foliar injury were similar”
Claim · model-written summary
Sensitivity rankings of tomato cultivars based on foliar injury were similar at 4 and 6 weeks of age.
- Taxon
- Lycopersicon esculentumSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- O 3e2
- Outcome
- sensitivity rankings based on foliar injurye2
- Direction
- similare2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Six cultures of Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.”
e2“Cultivars were more sensitive to O 3 at 4 than at 6 weeks but sensitivity rankings based on foliar injury were similar”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest ozone dose significantly inhibited growth of all tomato cultivars except Heinz 1439 at 6 weeks.
- Taxon
- Lycopersicon esculentumSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- highest O 3 dosee3
- Outcome
- growthe3
- Direction
- inhibitede3
- Qualifier
- except ‘Heinz 1439’ at 6 weekse3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Six cultures of Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.”
e3“The highest O 3 dose significantly inhibited the growth of all cultivars, except ‘Heinz 1439’ at 6 weeks”
Claim · model-written summary
Cultivar rankings based on average percent change in growth were more similar at 4 and 6 weeks than at 2 weeks.
- Taxon
- Lycopersicon esculentumSolanum lycopersicume0
- Outcome
- Cultivar rankings based on average percent change in growthe4
- Direction
- more similare4
- Comparator
- 2 weekse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Six cultures of Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.”
e4“Cultivar rankings based on average percent change in growth from control plants were more similar at 4 and 6 weeks compared with 2 weeks”
The same questions in other papers
ozone · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.