Abstract
In order to comprehend the radical-scavenging potential of mung bean and adzuki bean accessions,26 varieties of mung beans and 18 varieties of adzuki bean in China were studied for their radical scavenging activity and its stability. The results showed that there were significant differences in DPPH·,·OH,O-2·radical scavenging activities and reducing powers in the accessions of adzuki bean or mung bean,mung bean was better in scavenging O-2·radical,adzuki bean was better in scavenging DPPH· radical,both of them showed identical in scavenging ·OH radical and reducing powers. The DPPH· radical scavenging activity located mainly in seed coat,and there was no significant difference in ·OH radical scavenging activity for seed coat and cotyledon. When the extracted solution was treated for30 min in boiling water or 5 ~ 22 h in p H1. 5 buffer,the DPPH·radical scavenging activities remained 95. 2% ~ 105. 4%and 85. 4% ~ 152. 8%,respectively,and the ·OH radical scavenging activities remained 93. 6% ~ 105. 3% and37. 6% ~ 73. 4%,respectively. The remained DPPH· radical scavenging activities of bean coat extracts in 20% and55% alcohol solutions stored for 266 d were 81. 5% ~ 106. 8%.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Radical scavenging activities for DPPH, ·OH and O2- differed significantly among bean accessions.
- Taxon
- Mung bean (Vigna radiata) and Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis)
Vigna angularis
Vigna radiatat0 - Outcome
- DPPH·,·OH,O-2·radical scavenging activitiese1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Radical Scavenging Activities and Stability of Mung bean (Vigna radiata) and Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis) Accessions”
e1“there were significant differences in DPPH·,·OH,O-2·radical scavenging activities and reducing powers”
Claim · model-written summary
Reducing powers differed significantly among bean accessions.
- Taxon
- Mung bean (Vigna radiata) and Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis)
Vigna angularis
Vigna radiatat0 - Outcome
- reducing powerse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Radical Scavenging Activities and Stability of Mung bean (Vigna radiata) and Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis) Accessions”
e1“there were significant differences in DPPH·,·OH,O-2·radical scavenging activities and reducing powers”
Claim · model-written summary
Mung bean was better than adzuki bean in scavenging O2- radical.
- Taxon
- Mung bean (Vigna radiata)
Vigna radiatat0 - Outcome
- scavenging O-2·radicale3
- Direction
- bettere3
- Comparator
- adzuki beane3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Radical Scavenging Activities and Stability of Mung bean (Vigna radiata) and Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis) Accessions”
e3“mung bean was better in scavenging O-2·radical,adzuki bean was better in scavenging DPPH· radical”
Claim · model-written summary
Adzuki bean was better than mung bean in scavenging DPPH radical.
- Taxon
- Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis)
Vigna angularist0 - Outcome
- scavenging DPPH· radicale3
- Direction
- bettere3
- Comparator
- mung beane3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Radical Scavenging Activities and Stability of Mung bean (Vigna radiata) and Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis) Accessions”
e3“mung bean was better in scavenging O-2·radical,adzuki bean was better in scavenging DPPH· radical”
Claim · model-written summary
Mung bean and adzuki bean were identical in ·OH radical scavenging and reducing powers.
- Taxon
- Mung bean (Vigna radiata) and Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis)
Vigna angularis
Vigna radiatat0 - Outcome
- scavenging ·OH radical and reducing powerse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Radical Scavenging Activities and Stability of Mung bean (Vigna radiata) and Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis) Accessions”
e5“both of them showed identical in scavenging ·OH radical and reducing powers”
Claim · model-written summary
DPPH radical scavenging activity was located mainly in the seed coat.
- Taxon
- Mung bean (Vigna radiata) and Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis)
Vigna angularis
Vigna radiatat0 - Organ / stage
- seed coate6
- Outcome
- DPPH· radical scavenging activitye6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Radical Scavenging Activities and Stability of Mung bean (Vigna radiata) and Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis) Accessions”
e6“The DPPH· radical scavenging activity located mainly in seed coat”
Claim · model-written summary
No significant difference in ·OH radical scavenging activity between seed coat and cotyledon.
- Taxon
- Mung bean (Vigna radiata) and Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis)
Vigna angularis
Vigna radiatat0 - Organ / stage
- seed coat and cotyledone7
- Outcome
- ·OH radical scavenging activitye7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Radical Scavenging Activities and Stability of Mung bean (Vigna radiata) and Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis) Accessions”
e7“there was no significant difference in ·OH radical scavenging activity for seed coat and cotyledon”
Claim · model-written summary
After 30 min in boiling water, DPPH radical scavenging activity remained 95.2% to 105.4%.
- Taxon
- Mung bean (Vigna radiata) and Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis)
Vigna angularis
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- boiling watere1
- Outcome
- DPPH·radical scavenging activitiese2
- Direction
- remainede2
- Value
- 95. 2% ~ 105. 4%e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Radical Scavenging Activities and Stability of Mung bean (Vigna radiata) and Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis) Accessions”
e1“When the extracted solution was treated for30 min in boiling water”
e2“the DPPH·radical scavenging activities remained 95. 2% ~ 105. 4%”
Claim · model-written summary
After 5 to 22 h in pH 1.5 buffer, DPPH radical scavenging activity remained 85.4% to 152.8%.
- Taxon
- Mung bean (Vigna radiata) and Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis)
Vigna angularis
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- 5 ~ 22 h in p H1. 5 buffere1
- Outcome
- DPPH·radical scavenging activitiese2
- Direction
- remainede2
- Value
- 85. 4% ~ 152. 8%e3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Radical Scavenging Activities and Stability of Mung bean (Vigna radiata) and Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis) Accessions”
e1“or 5 ~ 22 h in p H1. 5 buffer”
e2“the DPPH·radical scavenging activities remained 95. 2% ~ 105. 4%”
e3“and 85. 4% ~ 152. 8%,respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
After 30 min in boiling water, ·OH radical scavenging activity remained 93.6% to 105.3%.
- Taxon
- Mung bean (Vigna radiata) and Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis)
Vigna angularis
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- boiling watere1
- Outcome
- ·OH radical scavenging activitiese2
- Direction
- remainede2
- Value
- 93. 6% ~ 105. 3%e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Radical Scavenging Activities and Stability of Mung bean (Vigna radiata) and Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis) Accessions”
e1“When the extracted solution was treated for30 min in boiling water”
e2“the ·OH radical scavenging activities remained 93. 6% ~ 105. 3%”
Claim · model-written summary
After 5 to 22 h in pH 1.5 buffer, ·OH radical scavenging activity remained 37.6% to 73.4%.
- Taxon
- Mung bean (Vigna radiata) and Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis)
Vigna angularis
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- 5 ~ 22 h in p H1. 5 buffere1
- Outcome
- ·OH radical scavenging activitiese2
- Direction
- remainede2
- Value
- 37. 6% ~ 73. 4%e3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Radical Scavenging Activities and Stability of Mung bean (Vigna radiata) and Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis) Accessions”
e1“or 5 ~ 22 h in p H1. 5 buffer”
e2“the ·OH radical scavenging activities remained 93. 6% ~ 105. 3%”
e3“and37. 6% ~ 73. 4%,respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
DPPH radical scavenging activity of bean coat extracts remained 81.5% to 106.8% after storage for 266 days in 20% and 55% alcohol.
- Taxon
- Mung bean (Vigna radiata) and Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis)
Vigna angularis
Vigna radiatat0 - Organ / stage
- bean coate1
- Treatment
- 20% and55% alcohol solutions stored for 266 de1
- Outcome
- DPPH· radical scavenging activitiese1
- Direction
- remainede1
- Value
- 81. 5% ~ 106. 8%e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Radical Scavenging Activities and Stability of Mung bean (Vigna radiata) and Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis) Accessions”
e1“The remained DPPH· radical scavenging activities of bean coat extracts in 20% and55% alcohol solutions stored for 266 d were 81. 5% ~ 106. 8%”
The same questions in other papers
processing · quality: phytochemicals · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →processing · quality: phytochemicals · Vigna angularis (adzuki bean)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.