Paper · 2010 · Xinjiang nongye kexue

Influence Irrigation by Salt-water of and Fresh-water on Cotton Yield and Fiber Quality

Yang Zhang

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

【Objective】In order to discuss the effect of gentle salt-water irrigation on yield of cotton and its quality,a field experiment was conducted at the national irrigation experiment station of Kuerle city in 2008.The research has studied the effect of gentle salt-water alternated with fresh-water irrigation on cotton yield and yield component.【Method】This experiment was carried out to use different gentle salt-water rate and different fresh-water rate to find out an appropriate amount of irrigation.【Result】The results showed that the cotton yield and its fiber quality can be improved by gentle salt-water alternated with fresh-water irrigation of 3 g/L of mineralized degree in the south Xinjiang.Salt which was carried into soil could be rush into a deep layer of the soil profile by fresh-water irrigation and winter irrigation,and the total salinity of the soil generally kept its balance.【Conclusion】By analyzing the tested index of every cotton growth stage,it was found out when gentle salt-water irrigation rate was 2 250 m3/hm2 and the fresh-water irrigation rate was 1 500 m3/hm2,cotton yield was higher.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternating saline and fresh irrigation at 3 g/L improved cotton yield in south Xinjiang.

Treatment
gentle salt-water alternated with fresh-water irrigation of 3 g/L of mineralized degreee0
Outcome
cotton yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Setting
south Xinjiange0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cotton yield and its fiber quality can be improved by gentle salt-water alternated with fresh-water irrigation of 3 g/L of mineralized degree in the south Xinjiang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–701 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternating saline and fresh irrigation at 3 g/L improved cotton fiber quality in south Xinjiang.

Treatment
gentle salt-water alternated with fresh-water irrigation of 3 g/L of mineralized degreee0
Outcome
fiber qualitye0
Direction
improvede0
Setting
south Xinjiange0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cotton yield and its fiber quality can be improved by gentle salt-water alternated with fresh-water irrigation of 3 g/L of mineralized degree in the south Xinjiang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–701 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh-water and winter irrigation moved introduced salt deeper in the soil profile.

Treatment
fresh-water irrigation and winter irrigatione0
Outcome
Salt which was carried into soil could be rush into a deep layer of the soil profilee0
Direction
rush into a deep layere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt which was carried into soil could be rush into a deep layer of the soil profile by fresh-water irrigation and winter irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–834 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton yield and its fiber quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–572 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil total salinity generally remained balanced under the irrigation regime.

Outcome
total salinity of the soile0
Direction
kept its balancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total salinity of the soil generally kept its balance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–896 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton yield and its fiber quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield was higher with 2 250 m3/hm2 saline irrigation and 1 500 m3/hm2 fresh irrigation.

Treatment
gentle salt-water irrigation rate was 2 250 m3/hm2 and the fresh-water irrigation rate was 1 500 m3/hm2e0
Outcome
cotton yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when gentle salt-water irrigation rate was 2 250 m3/hm2 and the fresh-water irrigation rate was 1 500 m3/hm2,cotton yield was higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1117 · show in text ↑

salinity · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

58 papers: 9 positive, 49 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

salinity · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 3 positive, 15 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

irrigation · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 73 positive, 61 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

irrigation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

399 papers: 304 positive, 95 negative or no effect

303 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

395 papers more in this group

See all 399 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.