Paper · 2014 · Anhui nongye kexue

Effects of Different Organic Fertilizers Application on the Chemical Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco Leaf

Wang Bao-yua

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objective] In order to study the effects of different organic fertilizers application on the yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco. [Method]A field experiment was carried out to study the effects of different organic fertilizers application on the chemical quality of flue-cured tobacco leaf in year 2012.[Result]The results showed that,compared to the conventional inorganic fertilizer treatment,the tobacco agronomic parameter was decreased in the conventional inorganic fertilizer + disease resistance fertilizer,conventional inorganic fertilizer + soil restoration fertilizer,refined organic fertilizer and organic-inorganic compound fertilizer treatment. The max leaf size and the average leaf size increased 47% and 44%,in the organic-inorganic compound fertilizer treatment,compared to the conventional inorganic fertilizer treatment,the day before harvest. The nicotine and Cl content decreased 8% and 19%,in the conventional inorganic fertilizer + disease resistance fertilizer treatment,compared to the conventional inorganic fertilizer treatment. The content of petroleum ether extract increased 4%,in the organic-inorganic compound fertilizer treatment,compared to the conventional inorganic fertilizer treatment. The yield and output value of flue-cured tobacco increased 6% and 8%,in the organic-inorganic compound fertilizer treatment,compared to the conventional inorganic fertilizer treatment.[Conclusion] The effects of different organic fertilizers application on the yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco varies by organic fertilizers type,scientific fertilizing suited to local conditions still need further research.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease resistance fertilizer decreased tobacco agronomic parameters.

Treatment
conventional inorganic fertilizer + disease resistance fertilizere0
Outcome
tobacco agronomic parametere0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
conventional inorganic fertilizer treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared to the conventional inorganic fertilizer treatment,the tobacco agronomic parameter was decreased in the conventional inorganic fertilizer + disease resistance fertilizer,conventional inorganic fertilizer + soil restoration fertilizer,refined organic fertilizer and organic-inorganic compound fertilizer treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–661 · show in text ↑
e1

“chemical quality of flue-cured tobacco leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil restoration fertilizer decreased tobacco agronomic parameters.

Treatment
conventional inorganic fertilizer + soil restoration fertilizere0
Outcome
tobacco agronomic parametere0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
conventional inorganic fertilizer treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared to the conventional inorganic fertilizer treatment,the tobacco agronomic parameter was decreased in the conventional inorganic fertilizer + disease resistance fertilizer,conventional inorganic fertilizer + soil restoration fertilizer,refined organic fertilizer and organic-inorganic compound fertilizer treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–661 · show in text ↑
e1

“chemical quality of flue-cured tobacco leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Refined organic fertilizer decreased tobacco agronomic parameters.

Treatment
refined organic fertilizere0
Outcome
tobacco agronomic parametere0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
conventional inorganic fertilizer treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared to the conventional inorganic fertilizer treatment,the tobacco agronomic parameter was decreased in the conventional inorganic fertilizer + disease resistance fertilizer,conventional inorganic fertilizer + soil restoration fertilizer,refined organic fertilizer and organic-inorganic compound fertilizer treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–661 · show in text ↑
e1

“chemical quality of flue-cured tobacco leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic-inorganic compound fertilizer decreased tobacco agronomic parameters.

Treatment
organic-inorganic compound fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
tobacco agronomic parametere0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
conventional inorganic fertilizer treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared to the conventional inorganic fertilizer treatment,the tobacco agronomic parameter was decreased in the conventional inorganic fertilizer + disease resistance fertilizer,conventional inorganic fertilizer + soil restoration fertilizer,refined organic fertilizer and organic-inorganic compound fertilizer treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–661 · show in text ↑
e1

“chemical quality of flue-cured tobacco leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compound fertilizer increased maximum leaf size by 47%.

Treatment
organic-inorganic compound fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
max leaf sizee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
47%e0
Comparator
conventional inorganic fertilizer treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The max leaf size and the average leaf size increased 47% and 44%,in the organic-inorganic compound fertilizer treatment,compared to the conventional inorganic fertilizer treatment,the day before harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–866 · show in text ↑
e1

“chemical quality of flue-cured tobacco leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compound fertilizer increased average leaf size by 44%.

Treatment
organic-inorganic compound fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
average leaf sizee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
44%e0
Comparator
conventional inorganic fertilizer treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The max leaf size and the average leaf size increased 47% and 44%,in the organic-inorganic compound fertilizer treatment,compared to the conventional inorganic fertilizer treatment,the day before harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–866 · show in text ↑
e1

“chemical quality of flue-cured tobacco leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease resistance fertilizer decreased nicotine content by 8%.

Treatment
conventional inorganic fertilizer + disease resistance fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
nicotinee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
8%e0
Comparator
conventional inorganic fertilizer treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nicotine and Cl content decreased 8% and 19%,in the conventional inorganic fertilizer + disease resistance fertilizer treatment,compared to the conventional inorganic fertilizer treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1059 · show in text ↑
e1

“chemical quality of flue-cured tobacco leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease resistance fertilizer decreased chlorine content by 19%.

Treatment
conventional inorganic fertilizer + disease resistance fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
Cl contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
19%e0
Comparator
conventional inorganic fertilizer treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nicotine and Cl content decreased 8% and 19%,in the conventional inorganic fertilizer + disease resistance fertilizer treatment,compared to the conventional inorganic fertilizer treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1059 · show in text ↑
e1

“chemical quality of flue-cured tobacco leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compound fertilizer increased petroleum ether extract content by 4%.

Treatment
organic-inorganic compound fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
content of petroleum ether extracte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4%e0
Comparator
conventional inorganic fertilizer treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The content of petroleum ether extract increased 4%,in the organic-inorganic compound fertilizer treatment,compared to the conventional inorganic fertilizer treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1227 · show in text ↑
e1

“chemical quality of flue-cured tobacco leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compound fertilizer increased tobacco yield by 6%.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Treatment
organic-inorganic compound fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6%e0
Comparator
conventional inorganic fertilizer treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“The yield and output value of flue-cured tobacco increased 6% and 8%,in the organic-inorganic compound fertilizer treatment,compared to the conventional inorganic fertilizer treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1412 · show in text ↑
e1

“chemical quality of flue-cured tobacco leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compound fertilizer increased tobacco output value by 8%.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Treatment
organic-inorganic compound fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
output valuee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8%e0
Comparator
conventional inorganic fertilizer treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“The yield and output value of flue-cured tobacco increased 6% and 8%,in the organic-inorganic compound fertilizer treatment,compared to the conventional inorganic fertilizer treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1412 · show in text ↑
e1

“chemical quality of flue-cured tobacco leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–294 · show in text ↑

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results differ

81 papers: 72 positive, 9 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

fertilization · organism · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 40 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

fertilization · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

182 papers: 154 positive, 28 negative or no effect

153 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

178 papers more in this group

See all 182 papers →

fertilization · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

214 papers: 187 positive, 27 negative or no effect

186 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

210 papers more in this group

See all 214 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.