Paper · 2012 · Tianjin Agricultural Sciences

Preparation of NAA Nano-suspensions and Its Impaction on the Growth of Alfalfa Seedlings

LV Jian-zhou

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Using micro-emulsion phacoemulsification treatment,NAA nano-suspensions was prepared,and its effect on the growth of alfalfa seedlings was studied.The results showed that:NAA nano suspension prepared by micro-emulsion-phacoemulsification,had small particle size,particle size distributed uniformly,water solubility and stability was good.The effect of 2.2 × 10-5 mol·L-1 NAA nano-suspension to promote growth was the best,but 2.2 × 10-4 mol·L-1suspension inhibited the most obvious.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The prepared NAA nano suspension had small, uniformly distributed particles and good water solubility and stability.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Outcome
small particle size,particle size distributed uniformly,water solubility and stability was goode0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NAA nano suspension prepared by micro-emulsion-phacoemulsification,had small particle size,particle size distributed uniformly,water solubility and stability was good.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–338 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2.2 × 10-5 mol·L-1 NAA nano suspension promoted alfalfa seedling growth best.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
2.2 × 10-5 mol·L-1 NAA nano-suspensione0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
promotee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of 2.2 × 10-5 mol·L-1 NAA nano-suspension to promote growth was the best”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–421 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2.2 × 10-4 mol·L-1 NAA suspension showed the strongest growth inhibition.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
2.2 × 10-4 mol·L-1suspensione0
Outcome
inhibitede0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2.2 × 10-4 mol·L-1suspension inhibited the most obvious.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–482 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–88 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.