Paper · 2015

Effect of planting geometry and nutrients levels on yield, yield attributes and economics of pigeonpea genotypes

Honey Kumar; B. G. Koppalkar; Bsavanneppa

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the Research Farm of Agricultural College, Raichur with three pigeonpea genotypes, two planting geometries and two nutrient levels under rainfed conditions during 2013-14. The results revealed that the differences in seed yield differed significantly among the three pigeonpea genotypes. The seed yield produced by genotype GRG-811 (1726 kg ha-1) was found to be significantly higher than the seed yield produced by ICP-8863(1502 kg ha-1), which was on par with TS-3R (1616 kg ha-1). The extent of reduction in seed yield by ICP-8863 and TS-3R was fifteen and seven per cent when compared with GRG-811, respectively. The net returns (Rs. 46905 ha-1) and BC ratio(2.94) were found to be significantly higher for GRG-811 as compared with ICP-8863 (` 38250 ha-1 and 2.43) and it was on par with TS-3R (` 42637 ha-1 and 2.59), respectively. Among different combinations, the spacing 90 x 30 cm and nutrient level NP 125% of the recommended dose recorded significantly higher seed yield (1693 kg ha-1) and net returns (` 46198 ha-1) when compared with all other combinations of spacing and nutrient levels viz., 60 x 30 cm with 100 per cent NP (1566 kg ha-1 and ` 39239 ha-1), 60 x 30 cm with 125 per cent NP (1576 kg ha-1 and ` 40845 ha-1) and was on par with 90 x 30 cm + 100 per cent NP (1625 kg ha-1 and ` 44107 ha-1), respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GRG-811 had higher seed yield than ICP-8863 and was comparable to TS-3R.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
GRG-811e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1726 kg ha-1e0
Qualifier
TS-3R (1616 kg ha-1)e0
Comparator
ICP-8863e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seed yield produced by genotype GRG-811 (1726 kg ha-1) was found to be significantly higher than the seed yield produced by ICP-8863(1502 kg ha-1), which was on par with TS-3R (1616 kg ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–519 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ICP-8863 seed yield was 15 percent lower than GRG-811.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
ICP-8863e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
fifteene0
Comparator
GRG-811e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extent of reduction in seed yield by ICP-8863 and TS-3R was fifteen and seven per cent when compared with GRG-811, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–652 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TS-3R seed yield was seven percent lower than GRG-811.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
TS-3Re0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
seven per cente0
Comparator
GRG-811e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extent of reduction in seed yield by ICP-8863 and TS-3R was fifteen and seven per cent when compared with GRG-811, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–652 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GRG-811 produced higher net returns than ICP-8863 and was comparable to TS-3R.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
GRG-811e0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs. 46905 ha-1e0
Comparator
ICP-8863e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The net returns (Rs. 46905 ha-1) and BC ratio(2.94) were found to be significantly higher for GRG-811 as compared with ICP-8863 (` 38250 ha-1 and 2.43) and it was on par with TS-3R (` 42637 ha-1 and 2.59), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GRG-811 had a higher BC ratio than ICP-8863 and was comparable to TS-3R.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
GRG-811e0
Outcome
BC ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.94e0
Comparator
ICP-8863e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The net returns (Rs. 46905 ha-1) and BC ratio(2.94) were found to be significantly higher for GRG-811 as compared with ICP-8863 (` 38250 ha-1 and 2.43) and it was on par with TS-3R (` 42637 ha-1 and 2.59), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 90 x 30 cm spacing with NP 125% produced higher seed yield than other specified combinations and was comparable to 90 x 30 cm with 100 percent NP.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
spacing 90 x 30 cm and nutrient level NP 125% of the recommended dosee0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1693 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
60 x 30 cm with 100 per cent NPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the spacing 90 x 30 cm and nutrient level NP 125% of the recommended dose recorded significantly higher seed yield (1693 kg ha-1) and net returns (` 46198 ha-1) when compared with all other combinations of spacing and nutrient levels viz., 60 x 30 cm with 100 per cent NP (1566 kg ha-1 and ` 39239 ha-1), 60 x 30 cm with 125 per cent NP (1576 kg ha-1 and ` 40845 ha-1) and was on par with 90 x 30 cm + 100 per cent NP (1625 kg ha-1 and ` 44107 ha-1), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1367 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 90 x 30 cm spacing with NP 125% produced higher net returns than other specified combinations and was comparable to 90 x 30 cm with 100 percent NP.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
spacing 90 x 30 cm and nutrient level NP 125% of the recommended dosee0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
46198 ha-1e0
Comparator
60 x 30 cm with 100 per cent NPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the spacing 90 x 30 cm and nutrient level NP 125% of the recommended dose recorded significantly higher seed yield (1693 kg ha-1) and net returns (` 46198 ha-1) when compared with all other combinations of spacing and nutrient levels viz., 60 x 30 cm with 100 per cent NP (1566 kg ha-1 and ` 39239 ha-1), 60 x 30 cm with 125 per cent NP (1576 kg ha-1 and ` 40845 ha-1) and was on par with 90 x 30 cm + 100 per cent NP (1625 kg ha-1 and ` 44107 ha-1), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1367 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–112 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

density · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 49 positive, 3 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.