Abstract
An experiment was conducted under field conditions to assess the efficacy of nursery treatments with carbofuran and root dips in three nematicidal formulations based on plant extracts (Max Raze, Max Cannon and Neem Gold) on the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, and on growth and yield of tomato. Seedlings from the nursery bed treated with carbofuran were free from galls while those from the untreated nursery bed showed an average galling index of 2.4. Seedlings from the treated nursery bed, when transplanted into an infested field, showed better plant performance, produced more fruit, and suppressed the nematode population compared to seedlings from the untreated infested nursery bed. All plant extract formulations controlled the root-knot nematode and increased yield of tomato, though Max Raze and Max Cannon were significantly more effective than Neem Gold.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Carbofuran nursery-bed treatment kept tomato seedlings free from galls, whereas seedlings from the untreated nursery bed had an average galling index of 2.4.
- Taxon
- TOMATO
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- nursery bed treated with carbofurane1
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitat0pathogen - Outcome
- gallse1
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede1
- Value
- 2.4e1
- Comparator
- untreated nursery bede1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA IN TOMATO”
e1“Seedlings from the nursery bed treated with carbofuran were free from galls while those from the untreated nursery bed showed an average galling index of 2.4”
Claim · model-written summary
Seedlings from the treated nursery bed, transplanted into an infested field, showed better plant performance than seedlings from the untreated infested nursery bed.
- Taxon
- TOMATOSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- treated nursery bede2
- Outcome
- plant performancee2
- Direction
- bettere2
- Comparator
- untreated infested nursery bede2
- Setting
- infested fielde2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA IN TOMATO”
e2“Seedlings from the treated nursery bed, when transplanted into an infested field, showed better plant performance, produced more fruit, and suppressed the nematode population compared to seedlings from the untreated infested nursery bed”
Claim · model-written summary
Seedlings from the treated nursery bed, transplanted into an infested field, produced more tomato fruit than seedlings from the untreated infested nursery bed.
- Taxon
- TOMATOSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- treated nursery bede2
- Outcome
- fruite2
- Direction
- moree2
- Comparator
- untreated infested nursery bede2
- Setting
- infested fielde2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA IN TOMATO”
e2“Seedlings from the treated nursery bed, when transplanted into an infested field, showed better plant performance, produced more fruit, and suppressed the nematode population compared to seedlings from the untreated infested nursery bed”
Claim · model-written summary
Seedlings from the treated nursery bed, transplanted into an infested field, suppressed the Meloidogyne incognita population compared with seedlings from the untreated infested nursery bed.
- Taxon
- TOMATOSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- treated nursery bede2
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
- Outcome
- nematode populatione2
- Direction
- suppressede2
- Comparator
- untreated infested nursery bede2
- Setting
- infested fielde2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA IN TOMATO”
e2“Seedlings from the treated nursery bed, when transplanted into an infested field, showed better plant performance, produced more fruit, and suppressed the nematode population compared to seedlings from the untreated infested nursery bed”
Claim · model-written summary
All plant-extract formulations controlled the root-knot nematode on tomato.
- Taxon
- TOMATOSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- plant extract formulationse3
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
- Outcome
- root-knot nematodee3
- Direction
- controllede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA IN TOMATO”
e3“All plant extract formulations controlled the root-knot nematode and increased yield of tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
All plant-extract formulations increased tomato yield.
- Taxon
- TOMATOSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- plant extract formulationse3
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- increasede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA IN TOMATO”
e3“All plant extract formulations controlled the root-knot nematode and increased yield of tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Max Raze and Max Cannon plant-extract formulations were significantly more effective than Neem Gold on tomato.
- Taxon
- TOMATOSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Max Raze and Max Cannone4
- Outcome
- effectivee4
- Direction
- more effectivee4
- Comparator
- Neem Golde4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA IN TOMATO”
e4“Max Raze and Max Cannon were significantly more effective than Neem Gold”
The same questions in other papers
carbofuran · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →transplanting · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
72 papers more in this group
See all 76 papers →botanical · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
113 papers more in this group
See all 117 papers →botanical · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
134 papers more in this group
See all 138 papers →transplanting · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.