Paper · 2010 · HortScience

Bell Pepper (Capsicum annum L.) Grown on Plastic Film Mulches: Effects on Crop Microenvironment, Physiological Attributes, and Fruit Yield

Juan Carlos Díaz-Pérez

16
claims
31
verbatim quotes
83
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Plastic mulches are widely used for the production of vegetables. There are numerous studies on the use of plastic mulches for peppers, although relatively few have focused on the microenvironmental and physiological impacts of plastic mulches on bell pepper. The objectives were to determine the effects of plastic film mulches on root zone temperature (RZT), soil water status, incidence of thrips and Tomato spotted wilt (TSW), plant growth, gas exchange, accumulation of mineral nutrients, and fruit yield in bell pepper. The study was conducted in Tifton, GA, in the Fall of 2002 and the Spring of 2003 using eight colored plastic mulches. Plastic mulch color influenced the microenvironmental, physiological, and yield responses of bell pepper plants. Plastic film mulches differed in their soil-warming ability with RZTs in both spring and fall being highest in black mulches and lowest in silver mulches. The percentage of photosynthetically active radiation ( PAR ) reflected from the mulches was highest in silver mulches and lowest in black mulches. The mean RZT under the plastic mulch decreased with increasing percentages of reflected PAR . The number of thrips per flower and the incidence of TSW in mature plants were not significantly different among plastic mulch treatments. The number of thrips per flower had no relationship with the percentage of reflected PAR or with RZT. Plastic mulch treatments had no significant effect on soil water status. Neither soil water content nor soil water potential had a relationship with RZT. In the fall season, during the first 28 days after transplanting, plant growth attributes were among the highest in silver mulches and the lowest in black mulches. Gas exchange and accumulation of mineral nutrients in the leaves and the fruit were not significantly affected by plastic mulches. Both marketable and total yields were higher on silver mulches and lowest on black mulch in the fall, whereas they were in general higher on silver with a black strip mulch and lowest on white and silver1 mulches in the spring. The reduced plant growth and fruit yields in black mulches during the fall were probably the result of the increased RZTs, and thus higher heat accumulation, that resulted in higher plant heat stress conditions compared with silver and white mulches. Fruit yield decreased with mean seasonal RZTs above 27.5 °C. The optimal range of RZT for bell pepper fruit yield was computed to be 25 to 27.5 °C or less.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root zone temperature was highest under black mulch and lowest under silver mulch.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Outcome
RZTse0
Direction
higheste0

Verbatim

e0

“RZTs in both spring and fall being highest in black mulches and lowest in silver mulches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reflected PAR was highest for silver mulch and lowest for black mulch.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Outcome
percentage of photosynthetically active radiation ( PAR ) reflectede0
Direction
higheste0

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage of photosynthetically active radiation ( PAR ) reflected from the mulches was highest in silver mulches and lowest in black mulches.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean root zone temperature declined as reflected PAR increased.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
plastic mulche0
Outcome
mean RZTe0
Direction
decreasede0

Verbatim

e0

“The mean RZT under the plastic mulch decreased with increasing percentages of reflected PAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thrips per flower did not differ significantly by mulch.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
plastic mulch treatmentse0
Outcome
number of thrips per flowere0
Direction
not significantly differente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The number of thrips per flower and the incidence of TSW in mature plants were not significantly different among plastic mulch treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1293 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TSW incidence did not differ significantly by mulch.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
plastic mulch treatmentse0
Outcome
incidence of TSWe0
Direction
not significantly differente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The number of thrips per flower and the incidence of TSW in mature plants were not significantly different among plastic mulch treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1293 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thrips per flower had no relationship to reflected PAR or RZT.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
percentage of reflected PARe0
Outcome
number of thrips per flowere0
Direction
no relationshipe0

Verbatim

e0

“The number of thrips per flower had no relationship with the percentage of reflected PAR or with RZT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1395 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch had no significant effect on soil water status.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
Plastic mulch treatmentse0
Outcome
soil water statuse0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Plastic mulch treatments had no significant effect on soil water status.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil water content and potential were unrelated to RZT.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
RZTe0
Outcome
soil water content nor soil water potentiale0
Direction
relationshipe0

Verbatim

e0

“Neither soil water content nor soil water potential had a relationship with RZT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1469–1549 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early fall growth was highest under silver and lowest under black mulch.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Outcome
plant growth attributese0
Direction
higheste0

Verbatim

e0

“plant growth attributes were among the highest in silver mulches and the lowest in black mulches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1712 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gas exchange was not significantly affected by mulch.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
plastic mulchese0
Outcome
Gas exchangee0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Gas exchange and accumulation of mineral nutrients in the leaves and the fruit were not significantly affected by plastic mulches.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1714–1844 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral nutrient accumulation was not significantly affected by mulch.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
plastic mulchese0
Outcome
accumulation of mineral nutrientse0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Gas exchange and accumulation of mineral nutrients in the leaves and the fruit were not significantly affected by plastic mulches.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1714–1844 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall yields were highest on silver and lowest on black mulch.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Outcome
marketable and total yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Verbatim

e0

“Both marketable and total yields were higher on silver mulches and lowest on black mulch in the fall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1845–1945 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring yields were generally highest on silver with black strip and lowest on white and silver1 mulch.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Outcome
higher on silver with a black strip mulch and lowest on white and silver1 mulchese0
Direction
highere0

Verbatim

e0

“they were in general higher on silver with a black strip mulch and lowest on white and silver1 mulches in the spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1955–2071 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat accumulation under black mulch probably reduced fall growth and yield.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Outcome
reduced plant growth and fruit yieldse0
Direction
reducede0

Verbatim

e0

“The reduced plant growth and fruit yields in black mulches during the fall were probably the result of the increased RZTs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2073–2194 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit yield decreased above 27.5 °C mean seasonal RZT.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
mean seasonal RZTse0
Outcome
Fruit yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
27.5 °Ce0

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit yield decreased with mean seasonal RZTs above 27.5 °C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2324–2384 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Computed optimal RZT for fruit yield was 25 to 27.5 °C or less.

Taxon
bell peppere0
Outcome
optimal range of RZT for bell pepper fruit yielde0
Value
25 to 27.5 °Ce0

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal range of RZT for bell pepper fruit yield was computed to be 25 to 27.5 °C or less.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2385–2479 · show in text ↑

mulching · pest · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mulching · disease · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

mulching · nutrient: content · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mulching · physiology: water · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.