Paper · 2010 · Nematologia mediterranea

Biocontrol of Meloidogyne graminicola using rhizobacteria on rice seedlings

Pankaj Kumar; Ruchi Bansal; S.N. Nandal

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The potential of seven rhizobacterial strains to prevent attacks of rice cv. Basmati-370 seedlings by the rice root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola, was evaluated in screenhouse tests. In in planta tests, all the rhizobacteria were found to possess significant activity against M. graminicola. Seed inoculation with Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus Co99-70 was the most effective in preventing J2 penetration, by up to 92%. Bacillus sp. RKB-91, G. diazotrophicus Co99-70 and Pseudomonas sp. RKP-33 were highly effective in reducing galling severity (by more than 80%) and in lowering nematode multiplication. These bacteria also promoted root and shoot growth of seedlings. In an in vitro test, exposure to culture supernatant of G. diazotrophicus Co99-70, Pseudomonas sp. RKP-33, and Bacillus sp. RKB-91 significantly delayed and decreased egg hatching and irreversibly inactivated motility of infective juveniles of the nematode by 64%, 89% and 77%, respectively, within 24 h of exposure.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All seven rhizobacteria had significant activity against the nematode in planta.

Treatment
all the rhizobacteriae0
Interactor
M. graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae0pathogen
Outcome
activity against M. graminicolae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In in planta tests, all the rhizobacteria were found to possess significant activity against M. graminicola.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–300 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation with G. diazotrophicus Co99-70 reduced J2 penetration by up to 92%.

Treatment
Seed inoculation with Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus Co99-70e0
Interactor
Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus Co99-70Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicuse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
J2 penetratione0
Direction
preventinge0
Value
up to 92%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed inoculation with Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus Co99-70 was the most effective in preventing J2 penetration, by up to 92%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–430 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three bacterial strains reduced galling by more than 80%.

Treatment
Bacillus sp. RKB-91, G. diazotrophicus Co99-70 and Pseudomonas sp. RKP-33e0
Interactor
nematodeNematodae0pathogen
Outcome
galling severitye0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
more than 80%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus sp. RKB-91, G. diazotrophicus Co99-70 and Pseudomonas sp. RKP-33 were highly effective in reducing galling severity (by more than 80%) and in lowering nematode multiplication.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three strains lowered nematode multiplication.

Treatment
Bacillus sp. RKB-91, G. diazotrophicus Co99-70 and Pseudomonas sp. RKP-33e0
Interactor
nematodeNematodae0pathogen
Outcome
nematode multiplicatione0
Direction
loweringe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus sp. RKB-91, G. diazotrophicus Co99-70 and Pseudomonas sp. RKP-33 were highly effective in reducing galling severity (by more than 80%) and in lowering nematode multiplication.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These bacteria promoted seedling root and shoot growth.

Treatment
These bacteriae0
Outcome
root and shoot growthe0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These bacteria also promoted root and shoot growth of seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–680 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Culture supernatants of the three bacteria delayed and decreased nematode egg hatching.

Interactor
nematodeNematodae2pathogene0
Outcome
egg hatchinge0
Direction
delayed and decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“exposure to culture supernatant of G. diazotrophicus Co99-70, Pseudomonas sp. RKP-33, and Bacillus sp. RKB-91 significantly delayed and decreased egg hatching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–860 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–75 · show in text ↑
e2

“the nematode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–937 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three supernatants inactivated juvenile motility by 64%, 89% and 77%, respectively.

Interactor
nematodeNematodae0pathogen
Outcome
motility of infective juveniles of the nematodee0
Direction
inactivatede0
Value
64%, 89% and 77%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irreversibly inactivated motility of infective juveniles of the nematode by 64%, 89% and 77%, respectively, within 24 h of exposure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–75 · show in text ↑

Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · Meloidogyne graminicola · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

inoculation · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 26 positive, 3 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

inoculation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

399 papers: 362 positive, 37 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

395 papers more in this group

See all 399 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.