Paper · 2003

Effect of Coating and Wrapping materials on the shelf life of apple (Malus domestica cv.Borkh)

Imran Hayat; Tariq Masud; Habib Ahmed Rathore

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
38
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out to study the effect of different concentrations of calcium chloride (1%, 1.5%, 2%), paraffin wax coating and different wrapping materials (polyethylene, carton paper) inorder to increase the shelf life and to avoid the postharvest losses of Banky cultivars of apple. In physical characteristics general appearance (color and shape of fruit), weight loss percentage and organoleptic evaluation were studied during storage. In chemical characteristics, total soluble solids, pH, acidity, total sugar, reducing sugar and Vitamin C were analyzed after 15, 30, 45 and 60 days of storage. All the treatments had significant effect on the shelf life of fruits. However, Calcium chloride (2%) was reported superior to all other treatments. Calcium chloride (2%) proved very useful for reducing weight loss and shriveling and retained consumer acceptability even after 60 days of storage. Polyethylene packaging stood second position after 2% calcium chloride treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All coating and wrapping treatments significantly affected apple fruit shelf life.

Treatment
All the treatmentse0
Outcome
shelf life of fruitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the treatments had significant effect on the shelf life of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple (Malus domestica cv.Borkh)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium chloride at 2% was superior to the other treatments for fruit shelf life.

Treatment
Calcium chloride (2%)e0
Outcome
superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
all other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Calcium chloride (2%) was reported superior to all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–772 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple (Malus domestica cv.Borkh)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium chloride at 2% reduced fruit weight loss and shriveling.

Treatment
Calcium chloride (2%)e0
Outcome
weight loss and shrivelinge0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Calcium chloride (2%) proved very useful for reducing weight loss and shriveling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–854 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple (Malus domestica cv.Borkh)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium chloride at 2% retained consumer acceptability after 60 days of storage.

Treatment
Calcium chloride (2%)e0
Outcome
consumer acceptabilitye0
Direction
retainede0
Qualifier
after 60 days of storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Calcium chloride (2%) proved very useful for reducing weight loss and shriveling and retained consumer acceptability even after 60 days of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple (Malus domestica cv.Borkh)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polyethylene packaging ranked second after calcium chloride at 2%.

Treatment
Polyethylene packaginge0
Outcome
second positione0
Direction
second positione0
Comparator
2% calcium chloride treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Polyethylene packaging stood second position after 2% calcium chloride treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple (Malus domestica cv.Borkh)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑

calcium chloride dihydrate · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

47 papers: 41 positive, 6 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

calcium chloride dihydrate · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.