Paper · 2016 · HortScience

Response of ‘Italian Riesling’ Leaf Nitrogen Status and Fruit Composition (Vitis vinifera L.) to Foliar Nitrogen Fertilization

Danijela Janjanin; Marko Karoglan; Mirjana Herak Ćustić; et al.

3
claims
7
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two-year study was conducted on Italian Riesling cultivar with the aim to compare the effect of foliar sprays with different nitrogen forms on grapevine leaf N status, yield, and nitrogen compounds in grape juice. Treatments included no fertilization (control), soil NPK treatment, and three foliar treatments [amino acids, urea, ammonia (NH 4 + )/nitrate] applied four times during season, also treated with soil NPK. The application of 1% w/v urea significantly increased leaf total leaf N content in the second year of study. However, there were no effects on N compounds in grape juice, since changes in free amino nitrogen (FAN), NH 4 + , and consequently yeast assimilable nitrogen (YAN) were not consistent among the treatments and experimental years. Although increase of vine leaf N status was achieved by 1% w/v urea, additional modifying of application time (by moving it closer to veraison) is needed, with the aim to increase N compounds in grape juice as well.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea increased leaf total nitrogen in year two.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
1% w/v ureae0
Outcome
leaf total leaf N contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in the second year of studye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 1% w/v urea significantly increased leaf total leaf N content in the second year of study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–528 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments produced no consistent change in juice nitrogen compounds across years.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
three foliar treatmentse1
Outcome
N compounds in grape juicee0
Direction
no effectse0
Qualifier
not consistent among the treatments and experimental yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no effects on N compounds in grape juice, since changes in free amino nitrogen (FAN), NH 4 + , and consequently yeast assimilable nitrogen (YAN) were not consistent among the treatments and experimental years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–758 · show in text ↑
e1

“three foliar treatments [amino acids, urea, ammonia (NH 4 + )/nitrate]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–356 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–92 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend moving urea application nearer veraison to increase juice nitrogen.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Outcome
moving it closer to veraisone0
Qualifier
increase N compounds in grape juicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“additional modifying of application time (by moving it closer to veraison) is needed, with the aim to increase N compounds in grape juice as well.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–92 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.