Abstract
A trial was conducted to study the effect of pre-harvest spray of chemicals on shelf-life and quality of mango cv. KESHAR. The experiment involved pre-harvest spray of nutrients combined with chemicals and plant growth regulators. The treatments included GA 3 25 ppm + KNO 3 2 per cent (T 1 ), GA 3 25 ppm + ZnSO 4 0.05 per cent (T 2 ), GA 3 25 ppm + borex 1 per cent (T 3 ), GA 3 25 ppm + CaCl 2 2 per cent (T 4 ), 2, 4-D 20 ppm + KNO 3 2 per cent (T 5 ), 2, 4-D 20 ppm + ZnSO 4 0.05 per cent (T 6 ), 2, 4-D 20 ppm + borex 1 per cent (T 7 ) and 2, 4-D 20 ppm + CaCl 2 2 per cent (T 8 ). The results obtained indicated that the tree sprayed with 2, 4-D 20 ppm + ZnSO 4 0.05 per cent showed good results in fruit yield and yield attributing characters as well as shelf-life of mango. Whereas physical parameters like highest marketable fruit, minimum spoiled friut, minimum riped fruit as well as lowest days of ripening were recored in pre harvest spray of GA 3 25 ppm + borex 1 per cent. The quality parameters like TSS, acidity, ascorbic acid, vitamin-'A', colour, flavour, texture, taste and overall acceptability etc. were performed better in pre harvest spray of GA 3 25 ppm + ZnSO 4 0.05 per cent (T 2 ) and GA 3 25 ppm + CaCl 2 2 per cent(T 4 ).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
2, 4-D plus ZnSO 4 gave good fruit yield and yield attributes and shelf life.
- Taxon
- mango
_from_India.jpg?width=60)
Mangifera indicae0 - Treatment
- 2, 4-D 20 ppm + ZnSO 4 0.05 per cente0
- Outcome
- fruit yield and yield attributing characters as well as shelf-lifee0
- Direction
- good resultse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the tree sprayed with 2, 4-D 20 ppm + ZnSO 4 0.05 per cent showed good results in fruit yield and yield attributing characters as well as shelf-life of mango”
Claim · model-written summary
GA 3 plus borex gave the highest marketable fruit.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- GA 3 25 ppm + borex 1 per cente0
- Outcome
- marketable fruite0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest marketable fruit, minimum spoiled friut, minimum riped fruit as well as lowest days of ripening were recored in pre harvest spray of GA 3 25 ppm + borex 1 per cent”
t0“mango”
Claim · model-written summary
GA 3 plus borex gave minimum spoiled fruit.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- GA 3 25 ppm + borex 1 per cente0
- Outcome
- spoiled friute0
- Direction
- minimume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“minimum spoiled friut, minimum riped fruit as well as lowest days of ripening were recored in pre harvest spray of GA 3 25 ppm + borex 1 per cent”
t0“mango”
Claim · model-written summary
GA 3 plus borex gave minimum ripe fruit.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- GA 3 25 ppm + borex 1 per cente0
- Outcome
- riped fruite0
- Direction
- minimume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“minimum riped fruit as well as lowest days of ripening were recored in pre harvest spray of GA 3 25 ppm + borex 1 per cent”
t0“mango”
Claim · model-written summary
GA 3 plus borex gave the lowest days to ripening.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- GA 3 25 ppm + borex 1 per cente0
- Outcome
- days of ripeninge0
- Direction
- loweste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lowest days of ripening were recored in pre harvest spray of GA 3 25 ppm + borex 1 per cent”
t0“mango”
Claim · model-written summary
GA 3 plus ZnSO 4 performed better for mango quality parameters.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- GA 3 25 ppm + ZnSO 4 0.05 per cente0
- Outcome
- quality parameterse0
- Direction
- performed bettere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The quality parameters like TSS, acidity, ascorbic acid, vitamin-'A', colour, flavour, texture, taste and overall acceptability etc. were performed better in pre harvest spray of GA 3 25 ppm + ZnSO 4 0.05 per cent (T 2 ) and GA 3 25 ppm + CaCl 2 2 per cent(T 4 ).”
t0“mango”
Claim · model-written summary
GA 3 plus CaCl 2 performed better for mango quality parameters.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- GA 3 25 ppm + CaCl 2 2 per cente0
- Outcome
- quality parameterse0
- Direction
- performed bettere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The quality parameters like TSS, acidity, ascorbic acid, vitamin-'A', colour, flavour, texture, taste and overall acceptability etc. were performed better in pre harvest spray of GA 3 25 ppm + ZnSO 4 0.05 per cent (T 2 ) and GA 3 25 ppm + CaCl 2 2 per cent(T 4 ).”
t0“mango”
The same questions in other papers
calcium dichloride · quality: general · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
Gibberellic acid · quality: general · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
zinc sulfate · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Gibberellic acid · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree
10 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.