Paper · 2016 · Compost Science & Utilization

Microbiological Features Associated with the Suppression of Fusarium Wilt of Lettuce Studied by Applying a Single Selected Compost

Selma Franceschini; Massimo Pugliese; Angelo Garibaldi; et al.

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

The effect of compost suppressiveness towards Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lactucae has been studied using a combined approach. Bioassays have been carried out in controlled conditions to obtain standardization of the environment in order to minimize the disturbances and variability of the soil microbial communities. Compost addition has demonstrated significant efficacy in controlling the disease. The microbial activities and the bacterial and fungal concentrations have been quantified and correlated in a principal component analysis in order to clarify the correlation between the original variables. The samples were clearly distinguished between the substrates in which the plants were grown and the rhizosphere samples. Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE) has been used to track the microbial communities throughout the bioassays. The approach has shown to be useful in detecting both bacterial and fungal species that preferentially associate with the roots of seedlings. Detected microorganisms assumed to be involved in compost-mediated suppression had a high probability of being vital because they were not detected in the substrate where the plants were grown at the start of the experiment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost addition significantly controlled Fusarium wilt of lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Compost additione1
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lactucaeFusarium oxysporum f. sp. lactucaee0pathogen
Outcome
controlling the diseasee1
Direction
significant efficacye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lactucae
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lactucae · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fusarium Wilt of Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“The effect of compost suppressiveness towards Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lactucae has been studied using a combined approach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compost addition has demonstrated significant efficacy in controlling the disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–397 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Samples from the substrates and the rhizosphere were clearly distinguished by their microbial communities.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
The samples were clearly distinguishede2
Qualifier
between the substrates in which the plants were grown and the rhizosphere samplese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fusarium Wilt of Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–84 · show in text ↑
e2

“The samples were clearly distinguished between the substrates in which the plants were grown and the rhizosphere samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–726 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DGGE detected both bacterial and fungal species that preferentially associate with lettuce seedling roots.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Interactor
bacterial and fungal speciese3other
Outcome
detecting both bacterial and fungal speciese3
Qualifier
that preferentially associate with the roots of seedlingse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fusarium Wilt of Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–84 · show in text ↑
e3

“The approach has shown to be useful in detecting both bacterial and fungal species that preferentially associate with the roots of seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–990 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Microorganisms absent from the initial substrate are assumed to be involved in compost-mediated suppression.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
compost-mediated suppressione4
Qualifier
they were not detected in the substrate where the plants were grown at the start of the experimente4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fusarium Wilt of Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–84 · show in text ↑
e4

“Detected microorganisms assumed to be involved in compost-mediated suppression had a high probability of being vital because they were not detected in the substrate where the plants were grown at the start of the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1215 · show in text ↑

fertilization · Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lactucae · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.