Abstract
SummaryLarge increases in fruit size and yield of Victoria plum were obtained when mixtures of GA3 and an auxin were applied four and six weeks after petal fall, whether or not D PU was included in the mixtures. GA3 was essential in the first spray and beneficial in the second. Of the three auxins tested, 2,4,5-TP was more effective than NOXA, and, compared with NAA, did not reduce fruit size in the year of application or flowering in the following year. Hand thinning fruitlets two weeks after applying hormone sprays increased the size of the remaining fruits and the fruit bud production of the sprayed trees. The application of PP528 to sprayed trees, although reducing yield, failed to improve fruit weight and did not greatly alleviate the reduction in return bloom.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
GA3 and auxin mixtures applied four and six weeks after petal fall greatly increased fruit size.
- Taxon
- Victoria plume0
- Treatment
- mixtures of GA3 and an auxine0
- Outcome
- fruit sizee0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Qualifier
- four and six weeks after petal falle0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Large increases in fruit size and yield of Victoria plum were obtained when mixtures of GA3 and an auxin were applied four and six weeks after petal fall, whether or not D PU was included in the mixtures.”
Claim · model-written summary
GA3 and auxin mixtures applied four and six weeks after petal fall greatly increased yield.
- Taxon
- Victoria plume0
- Treatment
- mixtures of GA3 and an auxine0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Qualifier
- whether or not D PU was includede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Large increases in fruit size and yield of Victoria plum were obtained when mixtures of GA3 and an auxin were applied four and six weeks after petal fall, whether or not D PU was included in the mixtures.”
Claim · model-written summary
GA3 was essential in the first spray and beneficial in the second.
- Taxon
- plum
Prunus domesticat0 - Treatment
- GA3e0
- Outcome
- essential in the first spray and beneficial in the seconde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“GA3 was essential in the first spray and beneficial in the second.”
t0“plum,Prunus”
Claim · model-written summary
2,4,5-TP was more effective than NOXA.
- Taxon
- plum
Prunus domesticat0 - Treatment
- 2,4,5-TPe0
- Outcome
- more effectivee0
- Direction
- more effectivee0
- Comparator
- NOXAe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Of the three auxins tested, 2,4,5-TP was more effective than NOXA, and, compared with NAA, did not reduce fruit size in the year of application or flowering in the following year.”
t0“plum,Prunus”
Claim · model-written summary
Compared with NAA, 2,4,5-TP did not reduce fruit size in the application year.
- Taxon
- plum
Prunus domesticat0 - Treatment
- 2,4,5-TPe0
- Outcome
- fruit sizee0
- Direction
- did not reducee0
- Qualifier
- year of applicatione0
- Comparator
- NAAe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Of the three auxins tested, 2,4,5-TP was more effective than NOXA, and, compared with NAA, did not reduce fruit size in the year of application or flowering in the following year.”
t0“plum,Prunus”
Claim · model-written summary
Compared with NAA, 2,4,5-TP did not reduce flowering in the following year.
- Taxon
- plum
Prunus domesticat0 - Treatment
- 2,4,5-TPe0
- Outcome
- floweringe0
- Direction
- did not reducee0
- Qualifier
- following yeare0
- Comparator
- NAAe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Of the three auxins tested, 2,4,5-TP was more effective than NOXA, and, compared with NAA, did not reduce fruit size in the year of application or flowering in the following year.”
t0“plum,Prunus”
Claim · model-written summary
Hand thinning after hormone sprays increased remaining fruit size.
- Taxon
- plum
Prunus domesticat0 - Treatment
- Hand thinning fruitlets two weeks after applying hormone sprayse0
- Outcome
- size of the remaining fruitse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Hand thinning fruitlets two weeks after applying hormone sprays increased the size of the remaining fruits and the fruit bud production of the sprayed trees.”
t0“plum,Prunus”
Claim · model-written summary
Hand thinning after hormone sprays increased fruit bud production.
- Taxon
- plum
Prunus domesticat0 - Treatment
- Hand thinning fruitlets two weeks after applying hormone sprayse0
- Outcome
- fruit bud productione0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Hand thinning fruitlets two weeks after applying hormone sprays increased the size of the remaining fruits and the fruit bud production of the sprayed trees.”
t0“plum,Prunus”
Claim · model-written summary
PP528 applied to sprayed trees reduced yield.
- Taxon
- plum
Prunus domesticat0 - Treatment
- PP528e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- reducinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The application of PP528 to sprayed trees, although reducing yield, failed to improve fruit weight and did not greatly alleviate the reduction in return bloom.”
t0“plum,Prunus”
Claim · model-written summary
PP528 did not improve fruit weight.
- Taxon
- plum
Prunus domesticat0 - Treatment
- PP528e0
- Outcome
- fruit weighte0
- Direction
- failed to improvee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The application of PP528 to sprayed trees, although reducing yield, failed to improve fruit weight and did not greatly alleviate the reduction in return bloom.”
t0“plum,Prunus”
Claim · model-written summary
PP528 did not greatly alleviate reduced return bloom.
- Taxon
- plum
Prunus domesticat0 - Treatment
- PP528e0
- Outcome
- return bloome0
- Direction
- did not greatly alleviatee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The application of PP528 to sprayed trees, although reducing yield, failed to improve fruit weight and did not greatly alleviate the reduction in return bloom.”
t0“plum,Prunus”
The same questions in other papers
application · yield · Prunus domestica (plum)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →pruning · growth · Prunus domestica (plum)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →pruning · yield · Prunus domestica (plum)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →class · growth · Prunus domestica (plum)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
class · yield · Prunus domestica (plum)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
application · growth · Prunus domestica (plum)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.