Abstract
In this paper, during a 4-year period (2003-2006) effects of six pollenizers (President, Italian Prune, Stanley, Cacanska Rodna, Agen 707, and California Blue) on the degree of fruit set in the plum cultivar Cacanska Najbolja were examined. Besides the controlled pollination of this cultivar, open pollination was investigated. Functional pollen ability in pollenizer-cultivars was established by in vitro pollen germination. Degree of fruit set was determined comparing the number of fruit set (10 days after pollination, 21 days after pollination and number of harvested fruits) against the number of pollinated flowers. The results indicated that all pollenizer cultivars, studied in this paper, possessed satisfactory in vitro pollen germination (30.1-67.4%). The number of fruit set determined 10 days after pollination was very high and did not differ among pollenizers. Highly significant differences were found between the pollenizers in the number of fruit set 21 days after pollination and significant ones in relation to the number of harvested fruits. Compared to open pollination, higher number of fruit set 21 days after pollination and higher number of harvested fruits were obtained when cultivars Stanley (17.0%; 7.6%) and Italian Prune (14.6%; 6.9%) were used as pollenizers, therefore those cultivars are recommendable as good pollenizers for the cultivar Cacanska Najbolja.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
All tested pollenizers had satisfactory pollen germination of 30.1–67.4%.
- Taxon
- plum
Prunus domesticat0 - Outcome
- in vitro pollen germinatione0
- Value
- 30.1-67.4%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all pollenizer cultivars, studied in this paper, possessed satisfactory in vitro pollen germination (30.1-67.4%)”
t0“plum cultivar Cacanska Najbolja”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit set at 10 days was very high and did not differ among pollenizers.
- Taxon
- plumPrunus domesticat0
- Organ / stage
- 10 days after pollinatione0
- Outcome
- fruit sete0
- Direction
- did not differe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The number of fruit set determined 10 days after pollination was very high and did not differ among pollenizers.”
t0“plum cultivar Cacanska Najbolja”
Claim · model-written summary
Pollenizers differed significantly in number of fruit set 21 days after pollination.
- Taxon
- plumPrunus domesticat0
- Material
- pollenizerse0
- Outcome
- number of fruit set 21 days after pollinatione0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Highly significant differences were found between the pollenizers in the number of fruit set 21 days after pollination and significant ones in relation to the number of harvested fruits.”
t0“plum cultivar Cacanska Najbolja”
Claim · model-written summary
Pollenizers differed significantly in number of harvested fruits.
- Taxon
- plumPrunus domesticat0
- Material
- pollenizerse0
- Outcome
- number of harvested fruitse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Highly significant differences were found between the pollenizers in the number of fruit set 21 days after pollination and significant ones in relation to the number of harvested fruits.”
t0“plum cultivar Cacanska Najbolja”
Claim · model-written summary
Stanley pollination gave higher fruit set 21 days after pollination than open pollination (17.0%).
- Taxon
- plumPrunus domesticat0
- Treatment
- Stanleye0
- Outcome
- fruit set 21 days after pollinatione0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 17.0%e0
- Comparator
- open pollinatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared to open pollination, higher number of fruit set 21 days after pollination and higher number of harvested fruits were obtained when cultivars Stanley (17.0%; 7.6%) and Italian Prune (14.6%; 6.9%) were used as pollenizers”
t0“plum cultivar Cacanska Najbolja”
Claim · model-written summary
Stanley pollination gave higher harvested fruits than open pollination (7.6%).
- Taxon
- plumPrunus domesticat0
- Treatment
- Stanleye0
- Outcome
- harvested fruitse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 7.6%e0
- Comparator
- open pollinatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared to open pollination, higher number of fruit set 21 days after pollination and higher number of harvested fruits were obtained when cultivars Stanley (17.0%; 7.6%) and Italian Prune (14.6%; 6.9%) were used as pollenizers”
t0“plum cultivar Cacanska Najbolja”
Claim · model-written summary
Italian Prune pollination gave higher fruit set 21 days after pollination than open pollination (14.6%).
- Taxon
- plumPrunus domesticat0
- Treatment
- Italian Prunee0
- Outcome
- fruit set 21 days after pollinatione0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 14.6%e0
- Comparator
- open pollinatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared to open pollination, higher number of fruit set 21 days after pollination and higher number of harvested fruits were obtained when cultivars Stanley (17.0%; 7.6%) and Italian Prune (14.6%; 6.9%) were used as pollenizers”
t0“plum cultivar Cacanska Najbolja”
Claim · model-written summary
Italian Prune pollination gave higher harvested fruits than open pollination (6.9%).
- Taxon
- plumPrunus domesticat0
- Treatment
- Italian Prunee0
- Outcome
- harvested fruitse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 6.9%e0
- Comparator
- open pollinatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared to open pollination, higher number of fruit set 21 days after pollination and higher number of harvested fruits were obtained when cultivars Stanley (17.0%; 7.6%) and Italian Prune (14.6%; 6.9%) were used as pollenizers”
t0“plum cultivar Cacanska Najbolja”
Claim · model-written summary
Stanley and Italian Prune are recommended as pollenizers for Cacanska Najbolja.
- Taxon
- plumPrunus domesticat0
- Material
- Cacanska Najboljae0
- Outcome
- good pollenizerse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“those cultivars are recommendable as good pollenizers for the cultivar Cacanska Najbolja”
t0“plum cultivar Cacanska Najbolja”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · yield · Prunus domestica (plum)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.