Paper · 1967 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Study on Eradication of a Confined Population of Pink Bollworms by Release of Males Sterilized with Metepa123

Milton T. Ouye; Harry M. Graham

4
claims
12
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of sterile-male releases combined with winter cultural practices on a population of pink bollworms, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders), was studied in a large field cage through 2 cotton-growing seasons. In 1964, the treated population was reduced 80–90% compared with an untreated check by an estimated seasonal release ratio of 7:1 sterile males to normal males. However, the treated population continued to increase somewhat. In 1965, daily releases of sterilized males reduced the population 98%, despite some entry of moths from the adjacent check cage. No larvae were found during 4 consecutive weeks before this entry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1964 sterile male releases reduced the treated pink bollworm population 80–90% compared with an untreated check.

Treatment
estimated seasonal release ratio of 7:1 sterile males to normal malese0
Interactor
pink bollwormsPectinophora gossypiellae2pest
Outcome
population of pink bollwormse2
Direction
reducede0
Value
80–90%e0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1964, the treated population was reduced 80–90% compared with an untreated check by an estimated seasonal release ratio of 7:1 sterile males to normal males”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–375 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton-growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–214 · show in text ↑
e2

“population of pink bollworms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treated pink bollworm population continued to increase somewhat in 1964.

Interactor
pink bollwormsPectinophora gossypiellae2pest
Outcome
treated populatione0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treated population continued to increase somewhat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–439 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton-growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–214 · show in text ↑
e2

“population of pink bollworms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1965 daily sterile male releases reduced the pink bollworm population 98%.

Treatment
daily releases of sterilized malese0
Interactor
pink bollwormsPectinophora gossypiellae2pest
Outcome
populatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
98%e0
Qualifier
despite some entry of moths from the adjacent check cagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1965, daily releases of sterilized males reduced the population 98%, despite some entry of moths from the adjacent check cage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–569 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton-growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–214 · show in text ↑
e2

“population of pink bollworms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No larvae were found during four consecutive weeks before moth entry.

Interactor
pink bollwormsPectinophora gossypiellae2pest
Outcome
No larvae were founde0
Qualifier
during 4 consecutive weeks before this entrye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No larvae were found during 4 consecutive weeks before this entry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–636 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton-growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–214 · show in text ↑
e2

“population of pink bollworms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–109 · show in text ↑

maleate(2-) · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.