Abstract
In replicated small-plot field tests good control of thrips (primarily Frankliniella fusca (Hinds)) was obtained with sprays of Bayer 25141 (O,O-diethyl O-p-methylsulfinylphenyl phosphorothioate), toxaphene +DDT, Shell SD-3562 (dimethyl 1-(dimethylcarbamoyl)-1-propen-2-yl-phosphate), endrin + Shell SD-3562, methyl parathion +DDT, methyl parathion + Shell SD-4402 (1,3,4,5,6,7,8,8-octachloro-3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro-4, 7-methanophthalan), Bayer 29493 (O,O-dimethyl O-[4-methylthio-m-tolyl] phosphorothioate), Geigy 30494 (S-(2-5-dichlorophenylmercapto) methyl O,O-dimethyl phosphorodithioate), Zectran® (4-dimethylamino-3,5-xylylmethylcarbamate), Guthion® (O,O-dimethyl S-(4-oxo-1,2,3, benzotriazill-3-(4H)-ylmethyl) phorodithioate) +DDT, Sevin® (1-naphthyl N-methylcarbamate), toxaphene, and Geigy 30493 (S-(3,4-dichlorophenylthio)-methyl O,O-dimethyl phosphorodithioate). Better residual control was obtained with Bayer 25141, Shell SD-3562, and toxaphene +DDT than with the other materials in the test. The addition of Plyac (Polyethylene spreader-sticker) to sprays of toxaphene +DDT, Sevin, and Guthion +DDT did not improve the control or extend the residual activity of these materials against thrips. The application of toxaphene and Shell SD-3562 in the reemergence herbicide treatment failed to give any control of drips after the cotton came up. One application of Shell SD-3562 did not give as good season-long control as three applications at weekly intervals.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
The listed spray treatments gave good thrips control in field tests.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- sprays of Bayer 25141e0
- Interactor
- Frankliniella fusca
Frankliniella fuscae0pest - Outcome
- control of thripse0
- Direction
- goode0
- Setting
- field testse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In replicated small-plot field tests good control of thrips (primarily Frankliniella fusca (Hinds)) was obtained with sprays of Bayer 25141 (O,O-diethyl O-p-methylsulfinylphenyl phosphorothioate), toxaphene +DDT, Shell SD-3562 (dimethyl 1-(dimethylcarbamoyl)-1-propen-2-yl-phosphate), endrin + Shell SD-3562, methyl parathion +DDT, methyl parathion + Shell SD-4402 (1,3,4,5,6,7,8,8-octachloro-3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro-4, 7-methanophthalan), Bayer 29493 (O,O-dimethyl O-[4-methylthio-m-tolyl] phosphorothioate), Geigy 30494 (S-(2-5-dichlorophenylmercapto) methyl O,O-dimethyl phosphorodithioate), Zectran® (4-dimethylamino-3,5-xylylmethylcarbamate), Guthion® (O,O-dimethyl S-(4-oxo-1,2,3, benzotriazill-3-(4H)-ylmethyl) phorodithioate) +DDT, Sevin® (1-naphthyl N-methylcarbamate), toxaphene, and Geigy 30493 (S-(3,4-dichlorophenylthio)-methyl O,O-dimethyl phosphorodithioate).”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Bayer 25141, Shell SD-3562, and toxaphene plus DDT had better residual thrips control than other tested materials.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- Bayer 25141, Shell SD-3562, and toxaphene +DDTe0
- Outcome
- residual controle0
- Direction
- Bettere0
- Comparator
- the other materials in the teste0
Not reportedInteractorInteractor role
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Better residual control was obtained with Bayer 25141, Shell SD-3562, and toxaphene +DDT than with the other materials in the test.”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding Plyac did not improve control or residual activity for the specified sprays.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- addition of Plyace0
- Outcome
- control or extend the residual activitye0
- Direction
- did not improvee0
ThripsNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The addition of Plyac (Polyethylene spreader-sticker) to sprays of toxaphene +DDT, Sevin, and Guthion +DDT did not improve the control or extend the residual activity of these materials against thrips.”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Preemergence toxaphene application failed to control thrips after cotton emergence.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- toxaphenee0
- Outcome
- control of dripse0
- Direction
- failed to give anye0
- Qualifier
- after the cotton came upe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of toxaphene and Shell SD-3562 in the reemergence herbicide treatment failed to give any control of drips after the cotton came up.”
Claim · model-written summary
Preemergence Shell SD-3562 application failed to control thrips after cotton emergence.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- Shell SD-3562e0
- Outcome
- control of dripse0
- Direction
- failed to give anye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of toxaphene and Shell SD-3562 in the reemergence herbicide treatment failed to give any control of drips after the cotton came up.”
Claim · model-written summary
One Shell SD-3562 application gave poorer season-long control than three weekly applications.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- One application of Shell SD-3562e0
- Outcome
- season-long controle0
- Direction
- did not give as goode0
- Comparator
- three applications at weekly intervalse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“One application of Shell SD-3562 did not give as good season-long control as three applications at weekly intervals.”
t0“Cotton”
The same questions in other papers
toxaphene · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.