Paper · 1992 · Journal of Horticultural Science

Effects of fresh fruit characteristics and cold storage on the quality of dried apricots and peaches

P. C. Fourie; C. F. Hansmann; G. L. Wium

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of a two week cold storage period and fresh fruit characteristics on the quality of dried ‘Peeka’ apricots and ‘Elberta’ peaches were studied. The total soluble solids content of fresh apricots and peaches were both negatively correlated with the drying ratio. The ideal fresh size for production of large and extra-large dried apricots was 40 mm and larger, and for large dried peaches beteen 55 mm and 70 mm. Cold storage before drying had no detrimental effect on the quality of dried fruit and can be used effectively to extend the processing season.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh apricot soluble solids were negatively correlated with drying ratio.

Taxon
apricotsPrunus armeniacae0
Material
‘Peeka’t0
Organ / stage
fresh apricotse0
Outcome
drying ratioe0
Direction
negatively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total soluble solids content of fresh apricots and peaches were both negatively correlated with the drying ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–272 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Peeka’ apricots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–118 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh peach soluble solids were negatively correlated with drying ratio.

Taxon
peachesPrunus persicae0
Material
‘Elberta’t0
Organ / stage
fresh apricots and peachese0
Outcome
drying ratioe0
Direction
negatively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total soluble solids content of fresh apricots and peaches were both negatively correlated with the drying ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–272 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Elberta’ peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–140 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apricots of at least 40 mm fresh size were ideal for large and extra-large dried fruit.

Taxon
apricotsPrunus armeniacae0
Outcome
ideal fresh size for production of large and extra-large dried apricotse0
Value
40 mm and largere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ideal fresh size for production of large and extra-large dried apricots was 40 mm and larger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–369 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh peaches between 55 and 70 mm were ideal for large dried peaches.

Taxon
peachesPrunus persicat0
Outcome
large dried peachese0
Value
55 mm and 70 mme0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for large dried peaches beteen 55 mm and 70 mm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–422 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricots and peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two weeks of cold storage before drying did not harm dried fruit quality.

Taxon
apricots and peachesPrunus persicaPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
Cold storage before dryinge0
Outcome
quality of dried fruite0
Direction
no detrimental effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cold storage before drying had no detrimental effect on the quality of dried fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–505 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricots and peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–100 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Cold storage can extend the fruit processing season.

Taxon
apricots and peachesPrunus persicaPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
Cold storage before dryingt1
Outcome
extend the processing seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“can be used effectively to extend the processing season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–566 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricots and peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–100 · show in text ↑
t1

“Cold storage before drying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–449 · show in text ↑

cold · quality: general · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

cold · quality: general · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

processing · quality: general · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

processing · quality: general · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.