Paper · 1959 · Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science

Cold storage tests of canning peaches

T. Kishi; T. Hara; R. Yamashita

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

1. Cold storage tests of canning peaches were con-ducted in C-class storage houses in which tempera-ture was maintained between 0 and 5°C in 1956 and 1957. The varieties used in the tests were Kanto No. 2, No. 12 and No. 14. 2. Peaches stored for three weeks in the cold storage houses lost about 10 percent of their fresh weight. As no increase was obtained in the ratio of canned product to the packed flesh of stored peaches as compared with fresh ones, the loss in weight during cold storage was found to be net loss in canned product. 3. The longer the peaches were kept in cold storage, the more the deterioration in their flavor was. Off flavor was detected in the peaches stored for long period, though it was not clear that the off flavor was induced by physiological change in the fruits or by the conditions of the cold storage houses. 4. Among the varieties tested, Kanto No. 12 was. best in keeping quality, while no difference in keeping quality was found between the other two vari-eties. 5. The safe range of cold storage period of canning peaches during which their canning quality was retained without deterioration was 2_??_3 weeks, though it might be varied depending on the conditions of the storage house, handling method of fresh fruits before storing, and variety of canning peach.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three weeks of cold storage caused peaches to lose about 10 percent of their fresh weight.

Taxon
PeachesPrunus persicae1
Treatment
stored for three weeks in the cold storage housese1
Outcome
fresh weighte1
Direction
loste1
Value
about 10 percente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Peaches stored for three weeks in the cold storage houses lost about 10 percent of their fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold storage gave no increase in the ratio of canned product to packed flesh compared with fresh peaches.

Taxon
peachesPrunus persicae2
Treatment
stored peachese2
Outcome
ratio of canned product to the packed fleshe2
Direction
no increasee2
Comparator
fresh onese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“no increase was obtained in the ratio of canned product to the packed flesh of stored peaches as compared with fresh ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–455 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer cold storage increased the deterioration of peach flavor.

Taxon
peachesPrunus persicae3
Treatment
kept in cold storagee3
Outcome
deterioration in their flavore3
Direction
the moree3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The longer the peaches were kept in cold storage, the more the deterioration in their flavor was”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–639 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Off flavor was detected in peaches stored for a long period.

Taxon
peachesPrunus persicae4
Treatment
stored for long periode4
Outcome
Off flavore4
Qualifier
it was not clear that the off flavor was induced by physiological change in the fruits or by the conditions of the cold storage housese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Off flavor was detected in the peaches stored for long period, though it was not clear that the off flavor was induced by physiological change in the fruits or by the conditions of the cold storage houses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–845 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kanto No. 12 had the best keeping quality among the varieties tested.

Taxon
PeachesPrunus persicae1
Material
Kanto No. 12e5
Outcome
best in keeping qualitye5
Comparator
varieties testede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Among the varieties tested, Kanto No. 12 was. best in keeping quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–919 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peaches stored for three weeks in the cold storage houses lost about 10 percent of their fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–329 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No difference in keeping quality was found between the other two canning peach varieties.

Taxon
PeachesPrunus persicae1
Material
the other two vari-etiese6
Outcome
keeping qualitye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“no difference in keeping quality was found between the other two vari-eties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1002 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peaches stored for three weeks in the cold storage houses lost about 10 percent of their fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–329 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Canning peaches keep canning quality for a cold-storage period of about 2–3 weeks.

Taxon
canning peachese7
Outcome
safe range of cold storage periode7
Value
2_??_3 weekse7
Qualifier
though it might be varied depending on the conditions of the storage housee7

Verbatim

e7

“The safe range of cold storage period of canning peaches during which their canning quality was retained without deterioration was 2_??_3 weeks, though it might be varied depending on the conditions of the storage house, handling method of fresh fruits before storing, and variety of canning peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1304 · show in text ↑

cold · quality: general · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

storage · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

cold · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 14 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.