Abstract
Microbial and chemical insecticides provided control of Pieris rapae (L.) and Trichoplusia ni (Hübner) on cabbage when applied to field plots based on predetermined densities of eggs and small and large larvae. In excess of 90% of cabbage harvested from plots treated with suspensions of Pieris rapae granulosis virus, Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus, and Bacillus thuringiensis were marketable. The protection of the crop by microbial insecticides was similar to protection in plots treated with chemical insecticides in which marketable heads exceeded 95%.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Threshold-based microbial and chemical insecticides controlled Pieris rapae on cabbage.
- Taxon
- cabbage
Brassica oleracea var. capitatae0 - Treatment
- Microbial and chemical insecticidese0
- Interactor
- Pieris rapae
Pieris rapaee0pest - Outcome
- control of Pieris rapaee0
- Setting
- field plotse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Microbial and chemical insecticides provided control of Pieris rapae (L.) and Trichoplusia ni (Hübner) on cabbage when applied to field plots based on predetermined densities of eggs and small and large larvae”
Claim · model-written summary
Threshold-based microbial and chemical insecticides controlled Trichoplusia ni on cabbage.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae0
- Treatment
- Microbial and chemical insecticidese0
- Interactor
- Trichoplusia ni
Trichoplusia nie0pest - Outcome
- control of Pieris rapae (L.) and Trichoplusia nie0
- Setting
- field plotse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Microbial and chemical insecticides provided control of Pieris rapae (L.) and Trichoplusia ni (Hübner) on cabbage when applied to field plots based on predetermined densities of eggs and small and large larvae”
Claim · model-written summary
Over 90% of cabbage was marketable following the three microbial treatments.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae0
- Treatment
- suspensions of Pieris rapae granulosis virus, Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus, and Bacillus thuringiensise0
- Outcome
- cabbage harvested from plotse0
- Value
- In excess of 90%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In excess of 90% of cabbage harvested from plots treated with suspensions of Pieris rapae granulosis virus, Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus, and Bacillus thuringiensis were marketable”
Claim · model-written summary
Microbial insecticides protected cabbage similarly to chemical insecticides.
- Taxon
- CabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatat0
- Treatment
- microbial insecticidese0
- Outcome
- protection of the crope0
- Direction
- similare0
- Comparator
- chemical insecticidese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The protection of the crop by microbial insecticides was similar to protection in plots treated with chemical insecticides”
t0“Cabbage”
Claim · model-written summary
More than 95% of heads in chemical insecticide plots were marketable.
- Taxon
- CabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatat0
- Treatment
- chemical insecticidese0
- Outcome
- marketable headse0
- Direction
- exceedede0
- Value
- 95%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plots treated with chemical insecticides in which marketable heads exceeded 95%”
t0“Cabbage”
The same questions in other papers
insecticide · Pieris rapae · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →insecticide · Trichoplusia ni · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →insecticide · control · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.