Paper · 2013 · IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science

Effect of Compost Mixes on Vegetative Development and Fruit Yield of Okra (Abelmoscus Esculentus)

Adebayo A. G Adebayo A. G

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Effects of different compost mixes at 10tons ha -1 were studied on okra in 2009 to 2010 planting season. The experiment was a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replicates. Data collected were averaged over the two trials before being subjected to statistical analysis of variance and significant means compared using Duncan's Multiple Range Test. Nutrient analyses indicated that Tithonia compost (Th2pm) performed best followed by Chromonela compost (Ch3pm) and celosia compost (Ce3pm). Okra planted with Tithonia compost (Th2pm), cassava peel compost (Ca2pm) and elephant compost (Eg2pm) similarly had higher plant height. Cassava peel compost (Ca3pm), elephant grass compost (Eg2pm), cassava peel compost (Ca2pm) and elephant grass compost (Eg3pm) significantly had higher and similar effect on stem girth of okra, while okra planted with cassava peel compost(Ca2pm) and elephant grass compost(Eg2pm) significantly had higher number of leaves throughout the growing period. Okra planted with cassava peel compost (Ca2pm) significantly had higher number of fruit and fruit weight than other compost mixes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tithonia compost performed best in nutrient analyses of the compost mixes tested on okra.

Treatment
Tithonia compost (Th2pm)e2
Outcome
Nutrient analysese2
Direction
performed beste2
Comparator
Chromonela compost (Ch3pm) and celosia compost (Ce3pm)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Effects of different compost mixes at 10tons ha -1 were studied on okra in 2009 to 2010 planting season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–103 · show in text ↑
e2

“Nutrient analyses indicated that Tithonia compost (Th2pm) performed best followed by Chromonela compost (Ch3pm) and celosia compost (Ce3pm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra planted with Tithonia, cassava peel and elephant compost had similarly higher plant height in the 2009 to 2010 season.

Treatment
Tithonia compost (Th2pm), cassava peel compost (Ca2pm) and elephant compost (Eg2pm)e3
Outcome
plant heighte3
Direction
highere3
Setting
2009 to 2010 planting seasone1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Effects of different compost mixes at 10tons ha -1 were studied on okra in 2009 to 2010 planting season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–103 · show in text ↑
e3

“Okra planted with Tithonia compost (Th2pm), cassava peel compost (Ca2pm) and elephant compost (Eg2pm) similarly had higher plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–640 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cassava peel and elephant grass composts gave significantly higher and similar stem girth in okra.

Treatment
cassava peel compost (Ca3pm), elephant grass compost (Eg2pm), cassava peel compost (Ca2pm) and elephant grass compost (Eg3pm)e4
Outcome
stem girthe4
Direction
highere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Cassava peel compost (Ca3pm), elephant grass compost (Eg2pm), cassava peel compost (Ca2pm) and elephant grass compost (Eg3pm) significantly had higher and similar effect on stem girth of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–833 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra planted with cassava peel compost and elephant grass compost had significantly higher number of leaves throughout the growing period.

Treatment
cassava peel compost(Ca2pm) and elephant grass compost(Eg2pm)e5
Outcome
number of leavese5
Direction
highere5
Qualifier
throughout the growing periode5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“okra planted with cassava peel compost(Ca2pm) and elephant grass compost(Eg2pm) significantly had higher number of leaves throughout the growing period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–992 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra planted with cassava peel compost had significantly higher number of fruit and fruit weight than other compost mixes.

Treatment
cassava peel compost (Ca2pm)e6
Outcome
number of fruit and fruit weighte6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
other compost mixese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Okra planted with cassava peel compost (Ca2pm) significantly had higher number of fruit and fruit weight than other compost mixes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1123 · show in text ↑

Manihot esculenta · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Manihot esculenta · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Tithonia · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 62 positive, 5 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

fertilization · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

207 papers: 190 positive, 17 negative or no effect

189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

203 papers more in this group

See all 207 papers →

fertilization · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 355 positive, 18 negative or no effect

354 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.