Paper · 1977 · Japanese Journal of Crop Science

Studies on the Suitability for Storage of High Moisture Rough Rice : II. The cause of development of deteriorate rice on the high moisture rough rice in storage

Eiichi KITAMURA; Kazuhisa KATO

12
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

On the deterioration in the storage term of newly threshed fresh rough rice, the causes for the development of spotted rice and opaque rice were studied. 1. In the case of mixing storage of newly threshed rough rice and panicles in high moisture, the former developed many spotted grains but the latter did not. Consquently, the development of spotted rice related directly with the threshing process. (Table 1) 2. The surface of the brown rice from the newly threshed paddy suffered much mechanical damage by the threshing teeth, and in the majority of these grains, the spot developed at the site and in the same form as the damaged point. (Table 2) 3. The matured panicles sterilized at the heading time and non-sterilized were threshed when they were fresh, and then stored in high moisture conditions. The former had fewer spotted grains than the latter, and there was mold development in the spotted parts of the grains. (Table 3, 4) 4. When the newly threshed rough rice was stored until heavily deteriorated, the percent of spotted rice was a little less than the percent of the mechanically damaged grain. (Table 6) 5. Therefore, the cause for the quantity of spotted rice is explained by the following three factors: the mechanical damage on the grain surface, the mold propagation and the moisture condition. 6. When the high moisture rough rice above 20% was stored for many days, the opaque grains developed slowly without mechanical damage to the grain surface or mold in the paddy. In the final period of storage, the dry matter weight of the grain decreased and some of these grains were infected with aspergillus. In cases when the more mechanically damaged grains were stored, they had more opaque grains than the non-damaged and the much less opaque rice appeared in low temperature (8°C) than in high (32°C) in storage. (Table 7, 8, 9)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Newly threshed rough rice developed many spotted grains during high moisture storage while panicles did not.

Treatment
mixing storage of newly threshed rough rice and panicles in high moisturee0
Outcome
spotted grainse0
Direction
manye0
Comparator
paniclese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the case of mixing storage of newly threshed rough rice and panicles in high moisture, the former developed many spotted grains but the latter did not.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–311 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spotted rice development was related to threshing.

Treatment
threshing processe0
Outcome
development of spotted ricee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the development of spotted rice related directly with the threshing process.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–401 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most mechanically damaged grains developed spots at their damaged sites.

Outcome
spot developed at the site and in the same form as the damaged pointe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the majority of these grains, the spot developed at the site and in the same form as the damaged point.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rough Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sterilized panicles yielded fewer spotted grains than nonsterilized panicles.

Treatment
sterilizede1
Outcome
spotted grainse0
Direction
fewere0
Comparator
non-sterilizede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The former had fewer spotted grains than the latter, and there was mold development in the spotted parts of the grains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rough Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“The matured panicles sterilized at the heading time and non-sterilized were threshed when they were fresh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–760 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mold developed in spotted grain areas.

Interactor
molde0pathogen
Outcome
mold development in the spotted parts of the grainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was mold development in the spotted parts of the grains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rough Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–66 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In heavily deteriorated rice, spotted grain percentage was slightly below mechanically damaged grain percentage.

Outcome
percent of spotted ricee0
Direction
a little lesse0
Comparator
percent of the mechanically damaged graine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the percent of spotted rice was a little less than the percent of the mechanically damaged grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1114 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical damage, mold propagation and moisture explained the quantity of spotted rice.

Interactor
molde0pathogen
Outcome
quantity of spotted ricee0
Qualifier
mechanical damage on the grain surface, the mold propagation and the moisture conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cause for the quantity of spotted rice is explained by the following three factors: the mechanical damage on the grain surface, the mold propagation and the moisture condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1319 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Opaque grains developed slowly after prolonged storage above 20% moisture without damage or mold.

Treatment
high moisture rough rice above 20% was stored for many dayse0
Outcome
opaque grainse0
Direction
developed slowlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the high moisture rough rice above 20% was stored for many days, the opaque grains developed slowly without mechanical damage to the grain surface or mold in the paddy.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1496 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain dry matter weight decreased at the end of storage.

Outcome
dry matter weight of the graine0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the final period of storage, the dry matter weight of the grain decreased and some of these grains were infected with aspergillus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1630 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rough Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some grains were infected with aspergillus late in storage.

Interactor
aspergillusAspergilluse0pathogen
Outcome
grains were infected with aspergilluse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus
Aspergillus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“some of these grains were infected with aspergillus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1578–1630 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rough Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More mechanically damaged grains produced more opaque grains.

Treatment
more mechanically damaged grainse0
Outcome
opaque grainse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
non-damagede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In cases when the more mechanically damaged grains were stored, they had more opaque grains than the non-damaged”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1631–1743 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rough Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low storage temperature produced less opaque rice than high temperature.

Treatment
low temperature (8°C)e0
Outcome
opaque ricee0
Direction
much lesse0
Comparator
high (32°C)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the much less opaque rice appeared in low temperature (8°C) than in high (32°C) in storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1748–1839 · show in text ↑

cold · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.