Paper · 1996 · Journal of Horticultural Science

The effect of temperature and photoperiod on the rate of flower initiation and the onset of dormancy in the strawberry (FragariaxananassaDuch.)

P. Le Mière; P. Hadley; J. Darby; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
44
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryThe effects of temperature and photoperiod on flower and inflorescence initiation during the autumn were investigated in the strawberry cv. Elsanta. The variation in starch under these environmental conditions was also recorded, to test whether this might provide a useful indicator of the onset of imposed and/or true dormancy. Photoperiod had no effect on the rate of flower initiation or final flower number in the primary, secondary or tertiary inflorescences. Temperature had little effect on the final flower number in the primary inflorescence. However, the rate of flower initiation increased linearly with increasing temperature in the secondary (r2 = 0.98) and tertiary inflorescences (r2 = 0.97), to an optimum of 18.6°C in the secondary and 19.9°C in the tertiary inflorescence, and declined at temperatures above these. The quantity of starch in the roots increased during the autumn, and the rate of increase was negatively correlated with temperature. This indicates that root starch concentration is determined by temperature and therefore is not a useful indicator of the onset of true dormancy in ‘Elsanta’.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photoperiod had no effect on flower initiation rate or final flower number in primary, secondary or tertiary inflorescences.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Photoperiode0
Outcome
rate of flower initiation or final flower numbere0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photoperiod had no effect on the rate of flower initiation or final flower number in the primary, secondary or tertiary inflorescences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–470 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature had little effect on final flower number in primary inflorescences.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Organ / stage
primary inflorescencee0
Treatment
Temperaturee0
Outcome
final flower numbere0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Temperature had little effect on the final flower number in the primary inflorescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–557 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–118 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Secondary inflorescence flower initiation rate rose with temperature to an optimum of 18.6°C then declined.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Organ / stage
secondarye0
Treatment
temperaturee0
Outcome
rate of flower initiatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18.6°Ce0
Qualifier
declined at temperatures above thesee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rate of flower initiation increased linearly with increasing temperature in the secondary (r2 = 0.98) and tertiary inflorescences (r2 = 0.97), to an optimum of 18.6°C in the secondary and 19.9°C in the tertiary inflorescence, and declined at temperatures above these”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–838 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–118 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tertiary inflorescence flower initiation rate rose with temperature to an optimum of 19.9°C then declined.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Organ / stage
tertiary inflorescencee0
Treatment
temperaturee0
Outcome
rate of flower initiatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19.9°Ce0
Qualifier
declined at temperatures above thesee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rate of flower initiation increased linearly with increasing temperature in the secondary (r2 = 0.98) and tertiary inflorescences (r2 = 0.97), to an optimum of 18.6°C in the secondary and 19.9°C in the tertiary inflorescence, and declined at temperatures above these”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–838 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root starch quantity increased during autumn.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
quantity of starch in the rootse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
during the autumne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The quantity of starch in the roots increased during the autumn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–118 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root starch accumulation rate was negatively correlated with temperature.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
temperaturee0
Outcome
rate of increasee0
Direction
negatively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rate of increase was negatively correlated with temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–118 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded root starch concentration is not a useful indicator of true dormancy onset in Elsanta.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
Elsantae0
Outcome
not a useful indicator of the onset of true dormancye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root starch concentration is determined by temperature and therefore is not a useful indicator of the onset of true dormancy in ‘Elsanta’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–118 · show in text ↑

light · phenology · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

34 papers: 21 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.