Paper · 2014 · IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science

Nutrient Use Efficiency and Economics of Salad Cucumber Using Drip Fertigation in Naturally Ventilated Polyhouse

A R Jisha Chand

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was carried out in naturally ventilated polyhouse with four fertigation levels viz., 110, 100, 90 and 80 per cent recommended dose to determine suitable fertigation dose for salad cucumber under naturally ventilated polyhouse cultivation. Fertigation levels significantly affected (P < 0.05) cucumber yield. Plants that received 100 per cent recommended dose of fertigation (175:125:300 kg NPK ha -1 ) showed higher nutrient use efficiency of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium (508.93, 712.50, 296.88 kg ha -1 respectively) and recorded significantly higher yield (89.06 t ha -1 ) with highest water use efficiency (6167.78 kg ha -1 cm -1 ). The economic analysis of cucumber production revealed that 100 per cent recommended dose of fertigation has resulted into maximum Benefit Cost (BC) ratio of 3.42. Both increased and decreased fertigation levels showed almost equal yield which is significantly less than 100 per cent recommended dose.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The full recommended fertigation dose gave higher nitrogen use efficiency.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
100 per cent recommended dose of fertigation (175:125:300 kg NPK ha -1 )e0
Outcome
nutrient use efficiency of nitrogene0
Direction
highere0
Value
508.93e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants that received 100 per cent recommended dose of fertigation (175:125:300 kg NPK ha -1 ) showed higher nutrient use efficiency of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium (508.93, 712.50, 296.88 kg ha -1 respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–539 · show in text ↑
e1

“cucumber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The full recommended fertigation dose gave higher phosphorus use efficiency.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
100 per cent recommended dose of fertigation (175:125:300 kg NPK ha -1 )e0
Outcome
phosphorouse0
Direction
highere0
Value
712.50e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants that received 100 per cent recommended dose of fertigation (175:125:300 kg NPK ha -1 ) showed higher nutrient use efficiency of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium (508.93, 712.50, 296.88 kg ha -1 respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–539 · show in text ↑
e1

“cucumber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The full recommended fertigation dose gave higher potassium use efficiency.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
100 per cent recommended dose of fertigation (175:125:300 kg NPK ha -1 )e0
Outcome
potassiume0
Direction
highere0
Value
296.88 kg ha -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants that received 100 per cent recommended dose of fertigation (175:125:300 kg NPK ha -1 ) showed higher nutrient use efficiency of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium (508.93, 712.50, 296.88 kg ha -1 respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–539 · show in text ↑
e1

“cucumber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The full recommended fertigation dose yielded 89.06 t ha -1, significantly above other levels.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
100 per cent recommended dose of fertigatione1
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
89.06 t ha -1e2
Comparator
increased and decreased fertigation levelse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cucumber production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–702 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants that received 100 per cent recommended dose of fertigation (175:125:300 kg NPK ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–415 · show in text ↑
e2

“recorded significantly higher yield (89.06 t ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–596 · show in text ↑
e3

“Both increased and decreased fertigation levels showed almost equal yield which is significantly less than 100 per cent recommended dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The full recommended fertigation dose had the highest water use efficiency.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
100 per cent recommended dose of fertigatione1
Outcome
water use efficiencye2
Direction
higheste2
Value
6167.78 kg ha -1 cm -1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cucumber production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–702 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants that received 100 per cent recommended dose of fertigation (175:125:300 kg NPK ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–415 · show in text ↑
e2

“highest water use efficiency (6167.78 kg ha -1 cm -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The full recommended fertigation dose produced the maximum benefit-cost ratio.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
100 per cent recommended dose of fertigatione1
Outcome
Benefit Cost (BC) ratioe1
Direction
maximume1
Value
3.42e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cucumber production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–702 · show in text ↑
e1

“100 per cent recommended dose of fertigation has resulted into maximum Benefit Cost (BC) ratio of 3.42”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–819 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: water · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

94 papers: 78 positive, 16 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

90 papers more in this group

See all 94 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 263 positive, 25 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

284 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.