Paper · 1958 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Control of the Cabbage Looper with a Virus Disease1

F. L. McEwen; G. E. R. Hervey

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Laboratory and field experiments showed that the virus which causes polyhedrosis of the cabbage looper (Trichoplusia ni (Hbn.)) is a highly virulent pathogen. In laboratory tests an oral dosage of 0.001 ml. of an inoculum prepared by triturating the body contents of one virus-killed fifth-instar cabbage looper in 16 liters of water caused infection and death of all larvae treated. Field tests on cabbage, cauliflower and broccoli were conducted in which virus-killed cabbage loopers were triturated in water and applied at rates from 0.94 to 120 larvae per acre with a low volume sprayer applying 30 gallons per acre. In all of the four field experiments it was possible to initiate a polyhedrosis epidemic and thereby greatly reduce the cabbage looper population in such test plots. Although increased dosage caused more rapid disease progress, a dosage of 0.94 larva per acre initiated a polyhedrosis epidemic. Six months storage of the inoculum at 0° F. did not cause any apparent reduction in pathogenicity nor was there any adverse effect noted when TEPP or spreader-sticker (Rohm & Haas B-1956) was added to the inoculum when applied.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A minute oral virus dose infected and killed all treated cabbage looper larvae.

Treatment
an oral dosage of 0.001 ml. of an inoculume0
Interactor
cabbage looperTrichoplusia nie0pest
Outcome
infection and death of all larvaee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoplusia ni
Trichoplusia ni · InteractorWhitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an oral dosage of 0.001 ml. of an inoculum prepared by triturating the body contents of one virus-killed fifth-instar cabbage looper in 16 liters of water caused infection and death of all larvae treated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–382 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field tests on cabbage, cauliflower and broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus application initiated epidemics and greatly reduced cabbage looper populations in all four field experiments.

Treatment
polyhedrosis epidemice0
Interactor
cabbage looperTrichoplusia nie0pest
Outcome
cabbage looper populatione0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoplusia ni
Trichoplusia ni · InteractorWhitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In all of the four field experiments it was possible to initiate a polyhedrosis epidemic and thereby greatly reduce the cabbage looper population in such test plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–785 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field tests on cabbage, cauliflower and broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–432 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing virus dosage accelerated disease progress.

Treatment
increased dosagee0
Outcome
disease progresse0
Direction
more rapide0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased dosage caused more rapid disease progress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–847 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field tests on cabbage, cauliflower and broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 0.94 larva per acre dose initiated a polyhedrosis epidemic.

Treatment
a dosage of 0.94 larva per acree0
Outcome
polyhedrosis epidemice0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a dosage of 0.94 larva per acre initiated a polyhedrosis epidemic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–914 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field tests on cabbage, cauliflower and broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six months of frozen storage caused no apparent reduction in inoculum pathogenicity.

Treatment
Six months storage of the inoculum at 0° F.e0
Outcome
pathogenicitye0
Direction
did not cause any apparent reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Six months storage of the inoculum at 0° F. did not cause any apparent reduction in pathogenicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1013 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field tests on cabbage, cauliflower and broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding TEPP to the inoculum had no noted adverse effect.

Treatment
TEPPe0
Outcome
adverse effecte0
Direction
nor was there anye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nor was there any adverse effect noted when TEPP or spreader-sticker (Rohm & Haas B-1956) was added to the inoculum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field tests on cabbage, cauliflower and broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding spreader-sticker to the inoculum had no noted adverse effect.

Treatment
spreader-sticker (Rohm & Haas B-1956)e0
Outcome
adverse effecte0
Direction
nor was there anye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nor was there any adverse effect noted when TEPP or spreader-sticker (Rohm & Haas B-1956) was added to the inoculum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field tests on cabbage, cauliflower and broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–432 · show in text ↑

storage · disease · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

inoculation · disease · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 13 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.