Paper · 1989 · Journal of Horticultural Science

Effects of water stress and re watering on ribulose-1,5-bis-phosphate carboxylase activity, chlorophyll and protein contents in two cultivars of tomato

M. Castrillo; A. M. Calcagno

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
26
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryThe effects of water deficit and rewatering on ribulose-1,5-bis-phosphate carboxylase activity, chlorophyll and protein content were evaluated in plants of two cultivars of tomato. During the water deficit period, values of water potential, osmotic potential and relative water content decreased along with associated decreases in RuBPcase activity, protein content and chlorophyll content, being less marked for chlorophyll content. There was a significant correlation of RuBPcase activity and protein content with components of leaf water status from plants under water stress. The associated decrease of RuBPcase, chlorophyll and protein contents with decreased osmotic potential during the development of water deficit was evident. At the time the plants reached a water potential of –1.40 to –1.56 MPa (RI: first level of recovery after water stress), one group of plants was rewatered. The rest were kept under stress until the water potential reached values of –2.30 to –2.51 MPa (RII: second level of recovery after water stress). It was observed that all of the varieties measured at both levels (RI and RII) showed a gradual recovery, reaching or even surpassing the values of control plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During the water deficit period, water potential, osmotic potential and relative water content of tomato decreased.

Treatment
water deficite0
Outcome
water potential, osmotic potential and relative water contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two cultivars of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–151 · show in text ↑
e0

“During the water deficit period, values of water potential, osmotic potential and relative water content decreased along with associated decreases in RuBPcase activity, protein content and chlorophyll content, being less marked for chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During water deficit, RuBPcase activity and protein content of tomato decreased.

Treatment
water deficite0
Outcome
RuBPcase activity, protein contente0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two cultivars of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–151 · show in text ↑
e0

“During the water deficit period, values of water potential, osmotic potential and relative water content decreased along with associated decreases in RuBPcase activity, protein content and chlorophyll content, being less marked for chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During water deficit, chlorophyll content of tomato decreased, less markedly than RuBPcase activity and protein content.

Treatment
water deficite0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
decreasese0
Qualifier
less markede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two cultivars of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–151 · show in text ↑
e0

“During the water deficit period, values of water potential, osmotic potential and relative water content decreased along with associated decreases in RuBPcase activity, protein content and chlorophyll content, being less marked for chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–439 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RuBPcase activity and protein content were significantly correlated with components of leaf water status in tomato plants under water stress.

Treatment
water stresse1
Outcome
RuBPcase activity and protein contente1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two cultivars of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–151 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was a significant correlation of RuBPcase activity and protein content with components of leaf water status from plants under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–585 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decreases in RuBPcase, chlorophyll and protein contents were associated with decreased osmotic potential during development of water deficit.

Treatment
water deficite2
Outcome
RuBPcase, chlorophyll and protein contentse2
Direction
decreasee2
Qualifier
decreased osmotic potentiale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two cultivars of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–151 · show in text ↑
e2

“The associated decrease of RuBPcase, chlorophyll and protein contents with decreased osmotic potential during the development of water deficit was evident”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After rewatering, the measured values of tomato varieties recovered gradually at both recovery levels, reaching or even surpassing the values of control plants.

Treatment
rewaterede3
Outcome
gradual recoverye4
Direction
reaching or even surpassinge4
Comparator
control plantse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two cultivars of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–151 · show in text ↑
e3

“one group of plants was rewatered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–897 · show in text ↑
e4

“all of the varieties measured at both levels (RI and RII) showed a gradual recovery, reaching or even surpassing the values of control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1208 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

35 papers: 6 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

63 papers: 11 positive, 52 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

drought · physiology: enzyme activity · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.