Paper · 1986 · Australian Journal of Plant Physiology

Induction of Sensitivity to Gibberellic Acid in Wheat and Barley Caryopses: Effects of Dehydration, Temperature and the Role of the Embryo during Caryopsis Maturation

PB Nicholls

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The development of gibberellic acid sensitivity, which is measured by the level of α-amylase activity, has been investigated by comparing enzyme levels in freshly detached wheat and barley caryopses cultured on moist filter paper for various times and temperatures with those in caryopses dried over 35% (w / w) glycerol-water solutions or in caryopses air-dried in detached ears at controlled temperatures and by comparing enzyme levels in de-embryonated caryopses with intact ones, both being cultured in aqueous buffer solutions. Similar amounts of enzyme were produced in caryopses held moist or dried, although the duration of the lag period, and the rate of accumulation of α-amylase were markedly influenced by the length and temperature of main treatments. Likewise similar amounts of enzyme were produced in de-embryonated and intact caryopses cultured in an aqueous buffer if the latter were de- embryonated prior to incubation in solutions of gibberellic acid. However, when intact or de-brushed (removal of the apical tip) caryopses were incubated with GA3, less α-amylase was found in these incubates than in those incubates containing de-embryonated caryopses. These observations were found in incubates of both sensitized freshly harvested and normal mature caryopses. It is concluded that drying is not essential for the development of gibberellic acid sensitivity in the wheat and barley caryopses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Similar amounts of alpha-amylase were produced in wheat and barley caryopses held moist or dried.

Organ / stage
caryopsese0
Treatment
driede0
Outcome
amounts of enzymee0
Direction
Similare0
Comparator
held moiste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat and Barley Caryopses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“Similar amounts of enzyme were produced in caryopses held moist or dried”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The duration of the lag period and the rate of alpha-amylase accumulation in wheat and barley caryopses were markedly influenced by the length and temperature of the main treatments.

Treatment
length and temperature of main treatmentse0
Outcome
duration of the lag period, and the rate of accumulation of α-amylasee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat and Barley Caryopses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“the duration of the lag period, and the rate of accumulation of α-amylase were markedly influenced by the length and temperature of main treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–763 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Similar amounts of alpha-amylase were produced in de-embryonated and intact caryopses in aqueous buffer when the intact ones were de-embryonated before incubation in gibberellic acid solutions.

Treatment
de-embryonatede0
Outcome
amounts of enzymee0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
intact caryopsese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat and Barley Caryopses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“similar amounts of enzyme were produced in de-embryonated and intact caryopses cultured in an aqueous buffer if the latter were de- embryonated prior to incubation in solutions of gibberellic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–970 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When intact or de-brushed caryopses were incubated with GA3, less alpha-amylase was found than in incubates containing de-embryonated caryopses.

Treatment
incubated with GA3e0
Outcome
α-amylasee0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
de-embryonated caryopsese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat and Barley Caryopses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“when intact or de-brushed (removal of the apical tip) caryopses were incubated with GA3, less α-amylase was found in these incubates than in those incubates containing de-embryonated caryopses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1173 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that drying is not essential for the development of gibberellic acid sensitivity in wheat and barley caryopses.

Treatment
dryinge0
Outcome
development of gibberellic acid sensitivitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drying is not essential for the development of gibberellic acid sensitivity in the wheat and barley caryopses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1414 · show in text ↑

processing · physiology: enzyme activity · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

processing · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.