Paper · 2016 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Productivity enhancement of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik) through integrated crop management technologies

A. K. Tripathi

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The frontline demonstrations were conducted on 45 farmer's fields in the five adopted villages of Bundelkhand region of Madhya Pradesh during rabi seasons of 2010 to 2012 in rainfed condition on medium to heavy soil with medium fertility status under blackgram − lentil cropping system to study the productivity enhancement of lentil through improved production technologies. The results revealed that integrated crop management practices reduced the wilt disease incidence in lentil from 20.7 to 4.9 per cent (76.3 per cent), spray of systemic insecticide imidacloprid 17.8 SL reduced the aphid population from 17.0 to 7.6 per plant (55.2 per cent) in various years. The average 22- 27 pods per plant were obtained under improved technology over to farmer's practices (17-21). The seed yields of lentil under improved technology ranged between 5.02 to 10.5 q ha-1 with average yield of 8.63 q ha-1 which was 30.5 per cent higher over the farmer's practice (6.61 q ha-1). However, maximum average net returns (Rs.21666 ha-1) as well as benefit cost ratio (3.47) were recorded under improved technologies as compared to farmer's practice (Rs.15278 ha-1 and 2.96).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated management reduced lentil wilt incidence from 20.7 to 4.9 percent.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
integrated crop management practicese0
Outcome
wilt disease incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
76.3 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“integrated crop management practices reduced the wilt disease incidence in lentil from 20.7 to 4.9 per cent (76.3 per cent)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–525 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid spray reduced aphids from 17.0 to 7.6 per plant.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
spray of systemic insecticide imidacloprid 17.8 SLe0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
aphid populatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
55.2 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“spray of systemic insecticide imidacloprid 17.8 SL reduced the aphid population from 17.0 to 7.6 per plant (55.2 per cent)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved technology produced 22–27 pods per plant versus 17–21 under farmer practices.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
improved technologye0
Outcome
pods per plante0
Direction
overe0
Value
22- 27 pods per plante0
Comparator
farmer's practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“average 22- 27 pods per plant were obtained under improved technology over to farmer's practices (17-21)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–776 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average lentil seed yield under improved technology was 8.63 q ha-1, 30.5 percent higher than farmer practice.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
improved technologye0
Outcome
average yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
8.63 q ha-1e0
Qualifier
30.5 per cente0
Comparator
farmer's practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yields of lentil under improved technology ranged between 5.02 to 10.5 q ha-1 with average yield of 8.63 q ha-1 which was 30.5 per cent higher over the farmer's practice (6.61 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–970 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net returns under improved technology were Rs.21666 ha-1 versus Rs.15278 ha-1.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
improved technologiese0
Outcome
average net returnse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs.21666 ha-1e0
Comparator
farmer's practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum average net returns (Rs.21666 ha-1) as well as benefit cost ratio (3.47) were recorded under improved technologies as compared to farmer's practice (Rs.15278 ha-1 and 2.96)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benefit-cost ratio under improved technology was 3.47 versus 2.96 under farmer practice.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
improved technologiese0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Value
3.47e0
Comparator
farmer's practicee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“benefit cost ratio (3.47) were recorded under improved technologies as compared to farmer's practice (Rs.15278 ha-1 and 2.96)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1161 · show in text ↑

imidacloprid · pest · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · pest · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

insecticide · pest · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.