Paper · 2011 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Comparison of the Volatile Profile and Sensory Analysis of ‘Golden Reinders’ Apples after the Application of a Cold Air Period after Ultralow Oxygen (ULO) Storage

Rosa Altisent; Jordi Graell; Isabel Lara; et al.

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
15
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

All efforts to improve fruit quality are rewarded when consumers are satisfied after tasting the fruit. Apples are often stored under controlled atmosphere conditions to preserve them over time, but this frequently results in a loss of flavor. The aim of this work, which was based on two seasons, was to evaluate the influence of a period of short-term air storage (periods of 2 and 4 weeks) after removal from ultralow oxygen (ULO) storage (1 kPa of O(2)/1 kPa of CO(2)) with respect to increases in volatile compound emissions and the effect on standard and sensory quality in 'Golden Reinders' apples. The results showed that emissions of 26 volatile compounds increased as a result of ULO + 2 weeks or ULO + 4 weeks of storage. However, the results of tastings involving a panel of consumers and trained experts revealed that this increase was not matched by corresponding increases in either the degree of consumer preference or flavor attributes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emissions of 26 volatile compounds increased in Golden Reinders apples after ULO plus 2 or 4 weeks of storage.

Material
Golden Reinderse0
Treatment
ULO + 2 weeks or ULO + 4 weeks of storagee1
Outcome
emissions of 26 volatile compoundse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
26e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 'Golden Reinders' apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–604 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that emissions of 26 volatile compounds increased as a result of ULO + 2 weeks or ULO + 4 weeks of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–731 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The increase in volatile emissions after ULO plus 2 or 4 weeks was not matched by increases in consumer preference or flavor attributes of Golden Reinders apples.

Material
Golden Reinderse0
Treatment
ULO + 2 weeks or ULO + 4 weeks of storagee1
Outcome
consumer preference or flavor attributese2
Direction
not matched by corresponding increasese2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 'Golden Reinders' apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–604 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that emissions of 26 volatile compounds increased as a result of ULO + 2 weeks or ULO + 4 weeks of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–731 · show in text ↑
e2

“the results of tastings involving a panel of consumers and trained experts revealed that this increase was not matched by corresponding increases in either the degree of consumer preference or flavor attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–952 · show in text ↑

storage · pest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.