Paper · 1978 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Sterile Pink Bollworm: Field Releases for Population Suppression123

H. M. Graham

3
claims
7
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Releases of sterile adult Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) at a supposedly isolated planting of cotton did not suppress native populations. Immigration of moths from the Imperial Valley, 30 miles away, may explain the failure. Such immigration should be considered by investigators who are currently planning a large-scale effort to suppress the pink bollworm.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sterile adult pink bollworm releases did not suppress native populations at an isolated cotton planting.

Treatment
Releases of sterile adult Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders)e0
Interactor
Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae0pest
Outcome
native populationse0
Direction
did not suppresse0
Comparator
native populationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Releases of sterile adult Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) at a supposedly isolated planting of cotton did not suppress native populations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose immigration from the Imperial Valley as a possible explanation for suppression failure.

Interactor
mothse0pest
Outcome
failuree0
Qualifier
Immigration of moths from the Imperial Valley, 30 miles awaye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Immigration of moths from the Imperial Valley, 30 miles away, may explain the failure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–229 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bollworm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“planting of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–105 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise accounting for immigration when planning large-scale pink bollworm suppression.

Interactor
pink bollwormPectinophora gossypiellae0pest
Outcome
Such immigration should be considerede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Such immigration should be considered by investigators who are currently planning a large-scale effort to suppress the pink bollworm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–363 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bollworm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“planting of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–105 · show in text ↑

Pectinophora gossypiella · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.