Paper · 2016 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Influence of elevated carbon dioxide and ammonium nutrition on growth and nitrogen metabolism in wheat (Triticum aestivum)

LEKSHMY S; VANITA JAIN; SANGEETA KHETARPAL; et al.

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Growth under elevated CO2 (EC) conditions inhibits nitrate (NO3-) assimilation in crop plants, hence ammonium (NH4+) nutrition is beneficial compared to NO3– nutrition under EC conditions. In the present study, an attempt was made to compare the suitability NH4 + vs mixed NH4 + + NO3 – nutrition in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Wheat seedlings supplied with NH4+ alone or with both NH4+ + NO3– as nitrogen (N) source and grown under ambient (380 μl/l, AC) or elevated (600±50 μl/l, EC) CO2 conditions were analyzed for growth and biochemical parameters. Plants receiving only NH4+ as N source showed significant reduction in growth parameters. The negative effects of NH4+ nutrition were manifested in form of reduced root length, root surface area and thinner leaves under EC. Negative effects of NH4+ nutrition were ameliorated in plants receiving mixed NH4 + + NO3 – nutrition. Supplementing NO3 – -N with NH4+ -N led to the enhancement of various morphological and biochemical parameters in EC grown plants. Activity and gene expression of the enzymes, nitrate reductase and glutamine synthetase was significantly higher in plants supplied with both NH4+ + NO3– ions and grown in EC, as compared to plants grown in AC, resulting in lesser reduction in N content of the EC grown plants. Our study indicates that mixed NH4+ + NO3– nutrition will be more suitable for wheat cultivation under high CO2 conditions in future.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium alone significantly reduced wheat growth parameters.

Treatment
only NH4+ as N sourcee0
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants receiving only NH4+ as N source showed significant reduction in growth parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nutrition reduced wheat root length under elevated CO2.

Treatment
NH4+ nutritione0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
under ECe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The negative effects of NH4+ nutrition were manifested in form of reduced root length, root surface area and thinner leaves under EC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–779 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nutrition reduced wheat root surface area under elevated CO2.

Treatment
NH4+ nutritione0
Outcome
root surface areae0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
under ECe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The negative effects of NH4+ nutrition were manifested in form of reduced root length, root surface area and thinner leaves under EC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–779 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nutrition produced thinner wheat leaves under elevated CO2.

Treatment
NH4+ nutritione0
Outcome
leavese0
Direction
thinnere0
Qualifier
under ECe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The negative effects of NH4+ nutrition were manifested in form of reduced root length, root surface area and thinner leaves under EC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–779 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed ammonium and nitrate nutrition ameliorated negative effects of ammonium nutrition.

Treatment
mixed NH4 + + NO3 – nutritione0
Outcome
Negative effectse0
Direction
amelioratede0
Comparator
NH4+ nutritione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Negative effects of NH4+ nutrition were ameliorated in plants receiving mixed NH4 + + NO3 – nutrition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding nitrate to ammonium enhanced morphological and biochemical parameters in elevated CO2 wheat.

Treatment
Supplementing NO3 – -N with NH4+ -Ne0
Outcome
morphological and biochemical parameterse0
Direction
enhancemente0
Qualifier
EC grown plantse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Supplementing NO3 – -N with NH4+ -N led to the enhancement of various morphological and biochemical parameters in EC grown plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate reductase activity was significantly higher under elevated than ambient CO2 with mixed nitrogen nutrition.

Treatment
both NH4+ + NO3– ions and grown in ECe0
Gene
nitrate reductasee0
Outcome
Activitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
plants grown in ACe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Activity and gene expression of the enzymes, nitrate reductase and glutamine synthetase was significantly higher in plants supplied with both NH4+ + NO3– ions and grown in EC, as compared to plants grown in AC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glutamine synthetase activity was significantly higher under elevated than ambient CO2 with mixed nitrogen nutrition.

Treatment
both NH4+ + NO3– ions and grown in ECe0
Gene
glutamine synthetasee0
Outcome
Activitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
plants grown in ACe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Activity and gene expression of the enzymes, nitrate reductase and glutamine synthetase was significantly higher in plants supplied with both NH4+ + NO3– ions and grown in EC, as compared to plants grown in AC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate reductase expression was significantly higher under elevated than ambient CO2 with mixed nitrogen nutrition.

Treatment
both NH4+ + NO3– ions and grown in ECe0
Gene
nitrate reductasee0
Outcome
gene expressione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
plants grown in ACe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Activity and gene expression of the enzymes, nitrate reductase and glutamine synthetase was significantly higher in plants supplied with both NH4+ + NO3– ions and grown in EC, as compared to plants grown in AC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glutamine synthetase expression was significantly higher under elevated than ambient CO2 with mixed nitrogen nutrition.

Treatment
both NH4+ + NO3– ions and grown in ECe0
Gene
glutamine synthetasee0
Outcome
gene expressione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
plants grown in ACe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Activity and gene expression of the enzymes, nitrate reductase and glutamine synthetase was significantly higher in plants supplied with both NH4+ + NO3– ions and grown in EC, as compared to plants grown in AC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed nitrogen nutrition lessened the reduction in wheat nitrogen content under elevated CO2.

Treatment
ECe0
Outcome
N contente0
Direction
lesser reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in lesser reduction in N content of the EC grown plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1290 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–122 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend mixed ammonium and nitrate nutrition for wheat cultivation under future high CO2.

Outcome
mixed NH4+ + NO3– nutrition will be more suitablee0
Qualifier
under high CO2 conditions in futuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mixed NH4+ + NO3– nutrition will be more suitable for wheat cultivation under high CO2 conditions in future”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1424 · show in text ↑

ammonium · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

ammonium · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

co2 · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

63 papers: 23 positive, 40 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

co2 · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.