Paper · 2007 · Agricultural science digest

Studies on sprouting and rooting of single budded sugarcane setts in seedbed

Subhas Chandra Tudu; Dipak K. Mandal; Gopal Chandra De

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during spring of the year 2003 and 2004 at the Agricultural Farm of Palli Siksha Bhavana (Institute of Agriculture), Visva-Bharati, Sriniketan to study incubation of sugarcane setts with various treating materials and their effect on bud sprouting, shoot length, root number and branching. Per cent bud sprouting was significantly better in setts treated with 0.01% bavistin (97%) and cowdung slurry (96%) only. Urea solution suppressed bud sprouting (85%). Shoot length at 30 days after treatment (DAT) was significantly better (18.2 cm) in setts treated with cowdung slurry (cowdung : water = 1: 5) and 0.01% bavistin (17.4 cm). 1.0% DAP, 1.0% urea, 0.25% lime solution, IBA at 500 ppm and water soaking could not bring about any significant change in shoot length over control. Among all treatments, only IBA at 500 ppm resulted in thicker roots with least branching which is conducive for establishment of the setts in the main field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bavistin increased bud sprouting to 97%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
0.01% bavistine0
Outcome
bud sproutinge0
Direction
bettere0
Value
97%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“bud sprouting was significantly better in setts treated with 0.01% bavistin (97%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–413 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowdung slurry increased bud sprouting to 96%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
cowdung slurrye0
Outcome
96%e0
Value
96%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“cowdung slurry (96%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–438 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea solution suppressed sprouting to 85%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Urea solutione0
Outcome
bud sproutinge0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
85%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Urea solution suppressed bud sprouting (85%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–489 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowdung slurry improved 30 day shoot length to 18.2 cm.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
cowdung slurry (cowdung : water = 1: 5)e0
Outcome
Shoot lengthe0
Direction
bettere0
Value
18.2 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot length at 30 days after treatment (DAT) was significantly better (18.2 cm) in setts treated with cowdung slurry (cowdung : water = 1: 5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–633 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bavistin improved shoot length to 17.4 cm.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
0.01% bavistine0
Outcome
17.4 cme0
Value
17.4 cme0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“0.01% bavistin (17.4 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–662 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DAP, urea, lime, IBA and soaking did not significantly change shoot length.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
1.0% DAP, 1.0% urea, 0.25% lime solution, IBA at 500 ppm and water soakinge0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
could not bring about any significant changee0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“1.0% DAP, 1.0% urea, 0.25% lime solution, IBA at 500 ppm and water soaking could not bring about any significant change in shoot length over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA produced thicker roots with least branching.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
IBA at 500 ppme0
Outcome
roots with least branchinge0
Direction
thickere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“IBA at 500 ppm resulted in thicker roots with least branching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

27 papers: 27 positive, 0 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

47 papers: 40 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

nitrogen · quality: postharvest · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

lime · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

application · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 42 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.