Paper · 2016 · Soil Research

Mitigation of N2O emissions from surface-irrigated cropping systems using water management and the nitrification inhibitor DMPP

Hizbullah Jamali; Wendy Quayle; Clemens Scheer; et al.

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Soils under irrigated agriculture are a significant source of nitrous oxide (N2O) owing to high inputs of nitrogen (N) fertiliser and water. This study investigated the potential for N2O mitigation by manipulating the soil moisture deficit through irrigation scheduling in combination with, and in comparison to, using the nitrification inhibitor, 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP). Lysimeter cores planted with wheat were fitted with automated chambers for continuous measurements of N2O fluxes. Treatments included conventional irrigation (CONV), reduced deficit irrigation (RED), CONV-DMPP and RED-DMPP. The total seasonal volume of irrigation water applied was constant for all treatments but the timing and quantity in individual irrigation applications varied among treatments. 15N-labelled urea was used to track the source of N2O emissions and plant N uptake. The majority of N2O emissions occurred immediately after irrigations began on 1 September 2014. Applying RED and DMPP individually slightly decreased N2O emissions but when applied in combination (RED-DMPP) the greatest reductions in N2O emissions were observed. There was no effect of treatments on plant N uptake, 15N recovery or yield possibly because the system was not N limited. Half of the plant N and 53% to 87% of N2O was derived from non-fertiliser sources in soil, highlighting the opportunity to further exploit this valuable N pool.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced deficit irrigation slightly decreased N2O emissions from wheat compared with conventional irrigation.

Treatment
reduced deficit irrigation (RED)e2
Outcome
N2O emissionse1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
slightlye1
Comparator
conventional irrigation (CONV)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lysimeter cores planted with wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–421 · show in text ↑
e1

“Applying RED and DMPP individually slightly decreased N2O emissions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1035 · show in text ↑
e2

“Treatments included conventional irrigation (CONV), reduced deficit irrigation (RED), CONV-DMPP and RED-DMPP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–609 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DMPP slightly decreased N2O emissions from wheat.

Treatment
DMPPe2
Outcome
N2O emissionse1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
slightlye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lysimeter cores planted with wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–421 · show in text ↑
e1

“Applying RED and DMPP individually slightly decreased N2O emissions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1035 · show in text ↑
e2

“the nitrification inhibitor, 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–385 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced deficit irrigation combined with DMPP gave the greatest reductions in N2O emissions from wheat.

Treatment
RED-DMPPe2
Outcome
N2O emissionse1
Direction
greatest reductionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lysimeter cores planted with wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–421 · show in text ↑
e1

“the greatest reductions in N2O emissions were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1133 · show in text ↑
e2

“Treatments included conventional irrigation (CONV), reduced deficit irrigation (RED), CONV-DMPP and RED-DMPP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–609 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation and DMPP treatments had no effect on plant N uptake, 15N recovery or yield of wheat.

Treatment
treatmentse3
Outcome
plant N uptake, 15N recovery or yielde3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lysimeter cores planted with wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–421 · show in text ↑
e3

“There was no effect of treatments on plant N uptake, 15N recovery or yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1209 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half of the plant N of wheat was derived from non-fertiliser sources in soil.

Outcome
plant Ne4
Value
Halfe4
Qualifier
derived from non-fertiliser sources in soile4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lysimeter cores planted with wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–421 · show in text ↑
e4

“Half of the plant N and 53% to 87% of N2O was derived from non-fertiliser sources in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1346 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Between 53% and 87% of N2O from wheat cropping was derived from non-fertiliser sources in soil.

Outcome
N2Oe4
Value
53% to 87%e4
Qualifier
derived from non-fertiliser sources in soile4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lysimeter cores planted with wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–421 · show in text ↑
e4

“Half of the plant N and 53% to 87% of N2O was derived from non-fertiliser sources in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1346 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The majority of N2O emissions from wheat occurred immediately after irrigations began.

Outcome
N2O emissionse6
Qualifier
immediately after irrigations begane6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lysimeter cores planted with wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–421 · show in text ↑
e6

“The majority of N2O emissions occurred immediately after irrigations began”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–946 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The non-fertiliser soil N pool is a valuable resource to be further exploited in wheat systems.

Outcome
further exploit this valuable N poole5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lysimeter cores planted with wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–421 · show in text ↑
e5

“further exploit this valuable N pool”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1416 · show in text ↑

irrigation · environment: emissions · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

phosphorus · environment: emissions · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.