Paper · 2015 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Conjunctive use of bio-fertilizers and organics for improving growth, yield and quality of banana cv. Grand Naine

T.K. Hazarika; B.P. Nautiyal; R.K. Bhattacharyya

13
claims
31
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out to find out the response of combined application of bio-fertilizers and bio-control agents with organic manures and inorganic fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of tissue cultured banana cv. Grand Naine. The results indicate that growth; yield attributing characters and yield as well as fruits quality were significantly influenced by integration of bio-fertilizers, organic manures and inorganic fertilizers. The maximum pseudostem height (266.55 cm), girth (72.63 cm), number of suckers (8.07), were observed in the treatment consisting of 100% RDF + mycorrhiza (AM) + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianum (T8). This treatment also recorded superiority in yield attributing characters like hands per bunch (10.20), fingers per hand (22.87), fingers per bunch (187.00), weight of second hand (3.76 kg), bunch weight (24.42 kg) and yield (75.35 t/ha). The quality parameters of fruits in terms of moisture, titrable acidity, ascorbic acid, TSS, total, reducing and non-reducing sugars as well as sugar: acid ratio were also influenced by combined use of organic, inorganic and biological sources of nutrients. Hence, 100% RDF + AM + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianum can be considered as best INM treatment for enhancing growth, yield and quality of banana in Mizoram.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

pseudostem height was maximal with the integrated fertilizer and microbial treatment (266.55 cm).

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
100% RDF + mycorrhiza (AM) + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianum (T8)e0
Outcome
pseudostem heighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
266.55 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana cv. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum pseudostem height (266.55 cm), girth (72.63 cm), number of suckers (8.07), were observed in the treatment consisting of 100% RDF + mycorrhiza (AM) + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianum (T8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

girth was maximal with the integrated fertilizer and microbial treatment (72.63 cm).

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
100% RDF + mycorrhiza (AM) + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianum (T8)e0
Outcome
girthe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
72.63 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana cv. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum pseudostem height (266.55 cm), girth (72.63 cm), number of suckers (8.07), were observed in the treatment consisting of 100% RDF + mycorrhiza (AM) + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianum (T8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

number of suckers was maximal with the integrated fertilizer and microbial treatment (8.07).

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
100% RDF + mycorrhiza (AM) + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianum (T8)e0
Outcome
number of suckerse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
8.07e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana cv. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum pseudostem height (266.55 cm), girth (72.63 cm), number of suckers (8.07), were observed in the treatment consisting of 100% RDF + mycorrhiza (AM) + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianum (T8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

hands per bunch was superior with the integrated treatment (10.20).

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
100% RDF + mycorrhiza (AM) + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianum (T8)e0
Outcome
hands per bunche1
Direction
superioritye1
Value
10.20e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana cv. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum pseudostem height (266.55 cm), girth (72.63 cm), number of suckers (8.07), were observed in the treatment consisting of 100% RDF + mycorrhiza (AM) + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianum (T8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–667 · show in text ↑
e1

“This treatment also recorded superiority in yield attributing characters like hands per bunch (10.20), fingers per hand (22.87), fingers per bunch (187.00), weight of second hand (3.76 kg), bunch weight (24.42 kg) and yield (75.35 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

fingers per hand was superior with the integrated treatment (22.87).

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
100% RDF + mycorrhiza (AM) + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianum (T8)e0
Outcome
fingers per hande1
Direction
superioritye1
Value
22.87e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana cv. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum pseudostem height (266.55 cm), girth (72.63 cm), number of suckers (8.07), were observed in the treatment consisting of 100% RDF + mycorrhiza (AM) + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianum (T8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–667 · show in text ↑
e1

“This treatment also recorded superiority in yield attributing characters like hands per bunch (10.20), fingers per hand (22.87), fingers per bunch (187.00), weight of second hand (3.76 kg), bunch weight (24.42 kg) and yield (75.35 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

fingers per bunch was superior with the integrated treatment (187.00).

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
100% RDF + mycorrhiza (AM) + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianum (T8)e0
Outcome
fingers per bunche1
Direction
superioritye1
Value
187.00e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana cv. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum pseudostem height (266.55 cm), girth (72.63 cm), number of suckers (8.07), were observed in the treatment consisting of 100% RDF + mycorrhiza (AM) + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianum (T8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–667 · show in text ↑
e1

“This treatment also recorded superiority in yield attributing characters like hands per bunch (10.20), fingers per hand (22.87), fingers per bunch (187.00), weight of second hand (3.76 kg), bunch weight (24.42 kg) and yield (75.35 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

weight of second hand was superior with the integrated treatment (3.76 kg).

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
100% RDF + mycorrhiza (AM) + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianum (T8)e0
Outcome
weight of second hande1
Direction
superioritye1
Value
3.76 kge1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana cv. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum pseudostem height (266.55 cm), girth (72.63 cm), number of suckers (8.07), were observed in the treatment consisting of 100% RDF + mycorrhiza (AM) + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianum (T8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–667 · show in text ↑
e1

“This treatment also recorded superiority in yield attributing characters like hands per bunch (10.20), fingers per hand (22.87), fingers per bunch (187.00), weight of second hand (3.76 kg), bunch weight (24.42 kg) and yield (75.35 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

bunch weight was superior with the integrated treatment (24.42 kg).

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
100% RDF + mycorrhiza (AM) + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianum (T8)e0
Outcome
bunch weighte1
Direction
superioritye1
Value
24.42 kge1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana cv. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum pseudostem height (266.55 cm), girth (72.63 cm), number of suckers (8.07), were observed in the treatment consisting of 100% RDF + mycorrhiza (AM) + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianum (T8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–667 · show in text ↑
e1

“This treatment also recorded superiority in yield attributing characters like hands per bunch (10.20), fingers per hand (22.87), fingers per bunch (187.00), weight of second hand (3.76 kg), bunch weight (24.42 kg) and yield (75.35 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

yield was superior with the integrated treatment (75.35 t/ha).

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
100% RDF + mycorrhiza (AM) + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianum (T8)e0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
superioritye1
Value
75.35 t/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana cv. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum pseudostem height (266.55 cm), girth (72.63 cm), number of suckers (8.07), were observed in the treatment consisting of 100% RDF + mycorrhiza (AM) + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianum (T8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–667 · show in text ↑
e1

“This treatment also recorded superiority in yield attributing characters like hands per bunch (10.20), fingers per hand (22.87), fingers per bunch (187.00), weight of second hand (3.76 kg), bunch weight (24.42 kg) and yield (75.35 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nutrient sources influenced fruit moisture, titrable acidity, ascorbic acid.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
combined use of organic, inorganic and biological sources of nutrientse2
Outcome
moisture, titrable acidity, ascorbic acide2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“banana cv. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–113 · show in text ↑
e2

“The quality parameters of fruits in terms of moisture, titrable acidity, ascorbic acid, TSS, total, reducing and non-reducing sugars as well as sugar: acid ratio were also influenced by combined use of organic, inorganic and biological sources of nutrients.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nutrient sources influenced fruit TSS, total, reducing and non-reducing sugars.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
combined use of organic, inorganic and biological sources of nutrientse2
Outcome
TSS, total, reducing and non-reducing sugarse2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“banana cv. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–113 · show in text ↑
e2

“The quality parameters of fruits in terms of moisture, titrable acidity, ascorbic acid, TSS, total, reducing and non-reducing sugars as well as sugar: acid ratio were also influenced by combined use of organic, inorganic and biological sources of nutrients.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nutrient sources influenced fruit sugar: acid ratio.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
combined use of organic, inorganic and biological sources of nutrientse2
Outcome
sugar: acid ratioe2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“banana cv. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–113 · show in text ↑
e2

“The quality parameters of fruits in terms of moisture, titrable acidity, ascorbic acid, TSS, total, reducing and non-reducing sugars as well as sugar: acid ratio were also influenced by combined use of organic, inorganic and biological sources of nutrients.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1164 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the integrated treatment as the best INM treatment for banana growth, yield and quality in Mizoram.

Taxon
bananae3
Outcome
best INM treatment for enhancing growth, yield and quality of bananae3
Setting
Mizorame3

Verbatim

e3

“Hence, 100% RDF + AM + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianum can be considered as best INM treatment for enhancing growth, yield and quality of banana in Mizoram.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1332 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma harzianum · growth · MusaResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Azospirillum · growth · MusaResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · yield · MusaResults agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Azospirillum · yield · MusaResults agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · growth · MusaPositive and negative results

91 papers: 80 positive, 11 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

87 papers more in this group

See all 91 papers →

fertilization · yield · MusaPositive and negative results

128 papers: 118 positive, 10 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

124 papers more in this group

See all 128 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · MusaResults agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · MusaResults agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.