Paper · 2011 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Effect of Tillage and Crop Establishment Methods on Physical Properties of a Medium-Textured Soil under a Seven-Year Rice−Wheat Rotation

Mahesh K. Gathala; J. K. Ladha; Yashpal S. Saharawat; et al.

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
325
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Rice−wheat (Oryza sativa L.−Triticum aestivum L.) rotation is the major production system in Asia, covering about 18 million ha. Conventional practice of growing rice (puddled transplanting) and wheat (conventional till, CT) deteriorate soil physical properties, and are input- and energy-intensive. Zero-tillage (ZT) along with drill-seeding have been promoted to overcome these problems. A 7-yr permanent plot study evaluated various tillage and crop establishment (CE) methods on soil physical properties with an aim to improve soil health and resource-use efficiency. Treatments included transplanting and direct-seeding of rice on flat and raised beds with or without tillage followed by wheat in CT and ZT soil. Bulk density (Db) of the 10- to 20-cm soil layer was highest under puddled treatments (1.74–1.77 Mg m−3) and lowest under ZT treatments (1.66–1.71 Mg m−3). Likewise, soil penetration resistance (SPR) was highest at the 20-cm depth in puddled treatments (3.46−3.72 MPa) and lowest in ZT treatments (2.51–2.82 MPa). Compared with conventional practice, on average, water-stable aggregates (WSAs) > 0.25 mm were 28% higher in ZT direct-seeding with positive time trend of 4.02% yr−1. Infiltration was higher (0.29–0.40 cm h−1) in ZT treatments than puddled treatments (0.18 cm h−1). The least-limiting water range was about double in ZT direct-seeding than that of conventional practice. Gradual improvement in soil physical parameters in ZT system resulted in improvement in wheat yield and is expected to be superior in long-run on system (rice+wheat) basis. Further research is needed to understand mechanisms and requirements of two cereals with contrasting edaphic requirements in their new environment of ZT direct-seeding.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulk density of the 10- to 20-cm soil layer was highest under puddled treatments (1.74–1.77 Mg m−3).

Treatment
puddled treatmentse1
Outcome
Bulk density (Db) of the 10- to 20-cm soil layere1
Direction
higheste1
Value
1.74–1.77 Mg m−3e1
Comparator
ZT treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments included transplanting and direct-seeding of rice on flat and raised beds with or without tillage followed by wheat in CT and ZT soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–716 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bulk density (Db) of the 10- to 20-cm soil layer was highest under puddled treatments (1.74–1.77 Mg m−3) and lowest under ZT treatments (1.66–1.71 Mg m−3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulk density of the 10- to 20-cm soil layer was lowest under ZT treatments (1.66–1.71 Mg m−3).

Treatment
ZT treatmentse1
Outcome
Bulk density (Db) of the 10- to 20-cm soil layere1
Direction
loweste1
Value
1.66–1.71 Mg m−3e1
Comparator
puddled treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments included transplanting and direct-seeding of rice on flat and raised beds with or without tillage followed by wheat in CT and ZT soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–716 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bulk density (Db) of the 10- to 20-cm soil layer was highest under puddled treatments (1.74–1.77 Mg m−3) and lowest under ZT treatments (1.66–1.71 Mg m−3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil penetration resistance at 20 cm depth was highest under puddled treatments (3.46–3.72 MPa).

Treatment
puddled treatmentse2
Outcome
soil penetration resistance (SPR)e2
Direction
higheste2
Value
3.46−3.72 MPae2
Qualifier
at the 20-cm depthe2
Comparator
ZT treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments included transplanting and direct-seeding of rice on flat and raised beds with or without tillage followed by wheat in CT and ZT soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–716 · show in text ↑
e2

“soil penetration resistance (SPR) was highest at the 20-cm depth in puddled treatments (3.46−3.72 MPa) and lowest in ZT treatments (2.51–2.82 MPa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1030 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil penetration resistance was lowest under ZT treatments (2.51–2.82 MPa).

Treatment
ZT treatmentse2
Outcome
soil penetration resistance (SPR)e2
Direction
loweste2
Value
2.51–2.82 MPae2
Comparator
puddled treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments included transplanting and direct-seeding of rice on flat and raised beds with or without tillage followed by wheat in CT and ZT soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–716 · show in text ↑
e2

“soil penetration resistance (SPR) was highest at the 20-cm depth in puddled treatments (3.46−3.72 MPa) and lowest in ZT treatments (2.51–2.82 MPa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1030 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-stable aggregates above 0.25 mm were 28% higher in ZT direct-seeding than under conventional practice.

Treatment
ZT direct-seedinge3
Outcome
water-stable aggregates (WSAs) > 0.25 mme3
Direction
highere3
Value
28%e3
Comparator
conventional practicee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments included transplanting and direct-seeding of rice on flat and raised beds with or without tillage followed by wheat in CT and ZT soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–716 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared with conventional practice, on average, water-stable aggregates (WSAs) > 0.25 mm were 28% higher in ZT direct-seeding with positive time trend of 4.02% yr−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1197 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-stable aggregates above 0.25 mm showed a positive time trend of 4.02% per year under ZT direct-seeding.

Treatment
ZT direct-seedinge3
Outcome
water-stable aggregates (WSAs) > 0.25 mme3
Direction
positivee3
Value
4.02% yr−1e3
Qualifier
time trende3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments included transplanting and direct-seeding of rice on flat and raised beds with or without tillage followed by wheat in CT and ZT soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–716 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared with conventional practice, on average, water-stable aggregates (WSAs) > 0.25 mm were 28% higher in ZT direct-seeding with positive time trend of 4.02% yr−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infiltration was higher under ZT treatments (0.29–0.40 cm h−1) than under puddled treatments (0.18 cm h−1).

Treatment
ZT treatmentse4
Outcome
Infiltratione4
Direction
highere4
Value
0.29–0.40 cm h−1e4
Comparator
puddled treatmentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments included transplanting and direct-seeding of rice on flat and raised beds with or without tillage followed by wheat in CT and ZT soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–716 · show in text ↑
e4

“Infiltration was higher (0.29–0.40 cm h−1) in ZT treatments than puddled treatments (0.18 cm h−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The least-limiting water range was about double in ZT direct-seeding compared with conventional practice.

Treatment
ZT direct-seedinge5
Outcome
least-limiting water rangee5
Direction
about doublee5
Comparator
conventional practicee5

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments included transplanting and direct-seeding of rice on flat and raised beds with or without tillage followed by wheat in CT and ZT soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–716 · show in text ↑
e5

“The least-limiting water range was about double in ZT direct-seeding than that of conventional practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1401 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gradual improvement in soil physical parameters under the ZT system resulted in improved wheat yield.

Treatment
ZT systeme6
Outcome
wheat yielde6
Direction
improvemente6
Qualifier
Gradual improvement in soil physical parameterse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Gradual improvement in soil physical parameters in ZT system resulted in improvement in wheat yield and is expected to be superior in long-run on system (rice+wheat) basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1574 · show in text ↑
Associationhypothesisoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

The ZT system is expected to be superior in the long run on a rice+wheat system basis.

Treatment
ZT systeme6
Outcome
system (rice+wheat) basise6
Direction
superiore6
Qualifier
long-rune6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Gradual improvement in soil physical parameters in ZT system resulted in improvement in wheat yield and is expected to be superior in long-run on system (rice+wheat) basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1574 · show in text ↑

tillage · soil: physics · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 35 positive, 6 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.