Paper · 2002

Changes in glutamine synthetase activity in presence of aluminium complexes

Sándor Kertész; Attila Fábián; Ferenc Zsoldos; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In acidic soil release of aluminium (Al) from the solid phase in the rhizosphere is a stress for plants. The pH strongly influences speciation of Al(III), leading to distinct changes in Al phytotoxicity. A hypothesised mechanism of Al tolerance is the chelation and detoxi- fication of Al(III) by organic acids. Internal or external complex formation determines the behaviour of Al in the cell. Some natural and synthetic compounds were tested in glutamine synthetase (GS, EC 6.3.1.2) assay. GS (total) was extracted from leaves and roots of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown hydroponically. Magnesium activates both form of GS, but the enzyme activity shows characteristic changes along the Mg 2+ concentration range (0-32 mM). Our results confirmed the well-known protective role of citrate and malate, but presented a group of Al(III)-complexes, which activated the GS. In this group the ligand itself had no effect on reaction, however the Al(III)-complex enhanced the GS activity, even in low- Mg 2+ samples. Despite of this stimulation, Al 3+ could not substitute Mg 2+ in the suboptimal Mg 2+ - range, and it was not a competitor either.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnesium activated both glutamine synthetase forms, with activity changing across magnesium concentration.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
Magnesiume0
Gene
GSe0
Outcome
enzyme activitye0
Qualifier
Mg 2+ concentration range (0-32 mM)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Magnesium activates both form of GS, but the enzyme activity shows characteristic changes along the Mg 2+ concentration range (0-32 mM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–735 · show in text ↑
e1

“common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–577 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Citrate and malate protected glutamine synthetase activity.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
citrate and malatee0
Outcome
protective rolee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our results confirmed the well-known protective role of citrate and malate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–811 · show in text ↑
e1

“common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–577 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A group of Al(III)-complexes activated glutamine synthetase, even at low Mg 2+.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
Al(III)-complexe0
Gene
GSe0
Outcome
GS activitye0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
low- Mg 2+ samplese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Al(III)-complex enhanced the GS activity, even in low- Mg 2+ samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1020 · show in text ↑
e1

“common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–577 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ligand alone had no effect on the reaction.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
ligande0
Outcome
reactione0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the ligand itself had no effect on reaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–938 · show in text ↑
e1

“common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–577 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Al 3+ did not substitute for or compete with Mg 2+ in the suboptimal Mg 2+ range.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
could not substitute Mg 2+e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Al 3+ could not substitute Mg 2+ in the suboptimal Mg 2+ - range, and it was not a competitor either”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1151 · show in text ↑
e1

“common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–577 · show in text ↑

aluminium atom · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

magnesium atom · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.