Paper · 1991 · Indian journal of plant protection

Bioefficacy and Economics of Certain Insecticides Against Pod Infesting Pests of Pigeonpea Cajanus Cajan (L.) Millsp.

Himalay Sahu; S. K. Parsai; Ravindra Kumar Choudhary

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan(L.)Millsp.) is the most important pulse crop oc Madhya Pradesh and is severely damaged by pigeonpea pod fly (Melanagromyza obtusa Mall.) and pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner). Monocrotophos (0.05%), endosulfan (0.07%), fenvalerate (0.01%), decamethrin (0.002%), (Coliar spray), parathion (2%) and BHC (10%) + D.D.T. (5%) (1:1) dusts @ 25 kgjha. were applied twice at 50% flowering and 15 days later to control these pests during 1986–87 and 1987–88 at the Zonal Agricultural Research Station, Powarkheda (M.P.) The results indicated that monocrotophos and endosulfaD successfully checked the pod and grain damage by pod fly and pod borer resulting in nigher yields of pigeonpea. These treatments gave a net profit of Rs. 3097 and Rs. 2545/- per na. respectively with a cost/benefit ratio of 1:5.5.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monocrotophos reduced pod and grain damage by pod fly and pod borer in pigeonpea.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
monocrotophose1
Interactor
pod flye0pest
Second interactor
pod borere0pest
Outcome
pod and grain damagee1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“is severely damaged by pigeonpea pod fly (Melanagromyza obtusa Mall.) and pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–205 · show in text ↑
e1

“monocrotophos and endosulfaD successfully checked the pod and grain damage by pod fly and pod borer resulting in nigher yields of pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–708 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monocrotophos increased pigeonpea yield.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
monocrotophose1
Outcome
yields of pigeonpeae1
Direction
increaseinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“is severely damaged by pigeonpea pod fly (Melanagromyza obtusa Mall.) and pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–205 · show in text ↑
e1

“monocrotophos and endosulfaD successfully checked the pod and grain damage by pod fly and pod borer resulting in nigher yields of pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–708 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endosulfan reduced pod and grain damage by pod fly and pod borer in pigeonpea.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
endosulfaDe1
Interactor
pod flye0pest
Second interactor
pod borere0pest
Outcome
pod and grain damagee1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“is severely damaged by pigeonpea pod fly (Melanagromyza obtusa Mall.) and pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–205 · show in text ↑
e1

“monocrotophos and endosulfaD successfully checked the pod and grain damage by pod fly and pod borer resulting in nigher yields of pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–708 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endosulfan increased pigeonpea yield.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
endosulfaDe1
Outcome
yields of pigeonpeae1
Direction
increaseinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“is severely damaged by pigeonpea pod fly (Melanagromyza obtusa Mall.) and pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–205 · show in text ↑
e1

“monocrotophos and endosulfaD successfully checked the pod and grain damage by pod fly and pod borer resulting in nigher yields of pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–708 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monocrotophos treatment gave a net profit of Rs. 3097 per hectare with a cost/benefit ratio of 1:5.5.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
monocrotophose1
Outcome
net profite2
Value
Rs. 3097e2
Qualifier
cost/benefit ratio of 1:5.5e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“is severely damaged by pigeonpea pod fly (Melanagromyza obtusa Mall.) and pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–205 · show in text ↑
e1

“monocrotophos and endosulfaD successfully checked the pod and grain damage by pod fly and pod borer resulting in nigher yields of pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–708 · show in text ↑
e2

“These treatments gave a net profit of Rs. 3097 and Rs. 2545/- per na. respectively with a cost/benefit ratio of 1:5.5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–827 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endosulfan treatment gave a net profit of Rs. 2545 per hectare with a cost/benefit ratio of 1:5.5.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
endosulfaDe1
Outcome
net profite2
Value
Rs. 2545/-e2
Qualifier
cost/benefit ratio of 1:5.5e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“is severely damaged by pigeonpea pod fly (Melanagromyza obtusa Mall.) and pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–205 · show in text ↑
e1

“monocrotophos and endosulfaD successfully checked the pod and grain damage by pod fly and pod borer resulting in nigher yields of pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–708 · show in text ↑
e2

“These treatments gave a net profit of Rs. 3097 and Rs. 2545/- per na. respectively with a cost/benefit ratio of 1:5.5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–827 · show in text ↑

monocrotophos · pest · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

monocrotophos · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.