Paper · 2013 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Chemical weed management in lentil

Pooja Dhuppar; Anamika Gupta; D. Sarveshwara Rao

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of chemical weed management practices in lentil was studied during 2010–11 and 2011–12 at Agra (Utter Pradesh). The treatments included: control, pendimethalin 0.50 kg/ha, pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha, pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha, pendimethalin 1.25 kg/ha, pendimethalin 1.50 kg/ha and hand weeding. All herbicidal treatments including hand weeding significantly controlled the weeds. Among all the treatments hand weeding gave the highest weed control (84.8%) and produced lower weed biomass (54.0 g/m2). It gave maximum net income (` 30,850) with CBR of 1:4.4. Pendimethalin 1.5 kg/ha controlled the weeds effectively but germination of seeds were affected. Highest grain yield (1.50 t/ha) was recorded from hand weeding plot with 48.6 and 52.0% increase in yield during 2011 and 2012, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicidal treatments and hand weeding significantly controlled weeds in lentil.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
herbicidal treatments including hand weedinge0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weedse0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All herbicidal treatments including hand weeding significantly controlled the weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–387 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding gave highest weed control (84.8%) among lentil treatments.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
hand weedinge0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
higheste0
Value
84.8%e0
Comparator
all the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among all the treatments hand weeding gave the highest weed control (84.8%) and produced lower weed biomass (54.0 g/m2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–508 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding gave lower weed biomass (54.0 g/m2) among lentil treatments.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
hand weedinge0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
54.0 g/m2e0
Comparator
all the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among all the treatments hand weeding gave the highest weed control (84.8%) and produced lower weed biomass (54.0 g/m2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–508 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding produced net income of ` 30,850.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
hand weedinge1
Outcome
net incomee0
Value
` 30,850e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It gave maximum net income (` 30,850) with CBR of 1:4.4.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–565 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among all the treatments hand weeding gave the highest weed control (84.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–463 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding produced CBR of 1:4.4.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
hand weedinge1
Outcome
CBRe0
Value
1:4.4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It gave maximum net income (` 30,850) with CBR of 1:4.4.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–565 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among all the treatments hand weeding gave the highest weed control (84.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–463 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin 1.5 kg/ha controlled weeds in lentil.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
Pendimethalin 1.5 kg/hae0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weedse0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pendimethalin 1.5 kg/ha controlled the weeds effectively but germination of seeds were affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–662 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin 1.5 kg/ha affected germination of seeds in lentil.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
Pendimethalin 1.5 kg/hae0
Outcome
germination of seedse0

Not reportedInteractorInteractor roleComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pendimethalin 1.5 kg/ha controlled the weeds effectively but germination of seeds were affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–662 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding gave the highest lentil grain yield, 1.50 t/ha.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
hand weedinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
1.50 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest grain yield (1.50 t/ha) was recorded from hand weeding plot with 48.6 and 52.0% increase in yield during 2011 and 2012, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–804 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding increased lentil yield by 48.6 in 2011.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
hand weedinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
48.6e0
Qualifier
2011e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest grain yield (1.50 t/ha) was recorded from hand weeding plot with 48.6 and 52.0% increase in yield during 2011 and 2012, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–804 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding increased lentil yield by 52.0% in 2012.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
hand weedinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
52.0%e0
Qualifier
2012e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest grain yield (1.50 t/ha) was recorded from hand weeding plot with 48.6 and 52.0% increase in yield during 2011 and 2012, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–804 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–34 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

pendimethalin · weed · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

herbicide · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

47 papers: 36 positive, 11 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

herbicide · weed · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.