Paper · 2008 · ORYZA- An International Journal on Rice

Production potential, water-use efficiency and economics of hybrid rice under different levels of irrigation and weed management practices

Purabi Banerjee; D. Dutta; P. Bandyopadhyay; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of irrigation levels and weed management practices on yield, yield components, water-use efficiency and economics of hybrid rice (cv. Pro Agro 6444) was studied. The results revealed that continuous submergence of 5 ± 2 cm with weed free check (at fortnight interval) showed maximum grain yield (8.22 t ha-1) and yield attributes. Continuous submergence with unweeded control consumed maximum water (153 cm) and lowest water-use efficiency (4.02 kg ha-1 mm-1), while irrigation (5 cm) at 3 days after disappearance of ponded water with weed free check gave the maximum water-use efficiency (16.31 kg ha-1mm-1). The maximum net return (Rs.33,565 ha-1) was obtained under continuous submergence with weed free check, however, the benefit: cost ratio (1.94) was highest under continuous submergence with pre-emergence application of Pyrazosulfuron ethyl 10% WP @ 25 g ha-1 at 7 days after transplanting.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous submergence with fortnightly weed-free management produced maximum grain yield of 8.22 t ha-1.

Taxon
hybrid riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
continuous submergence of 5 ± 2 cm with weed free check (at fortnight interval)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
8.22 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“continuous submergence of 5 ± 2 cm with weed free check (at fortnight interval) showed maximum grain yield (8.22 t ha-1) and yield attributes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–341 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous submergence with weed-free management maximized yield attributes.

Taxon
hybrid riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
continuous submergence of 5 ± 2 cm with weed free check (at fortnight interval)e0
Outcome
yield attributese0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“continuous submergence of 5 ± 2 cm with weed free check (at fortnight interval) showed maximum grain yield (8.22 t ha-1) and yield attributes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–341 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous submergence without weeding used the most water, 153 cm.

Taxon
hybrid riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
Continuous submergence with unweeded controle0
Outcome
watere0
Direction
maximume0
Value
153 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Continuous submergence with unweeded control consumed maximum water (153 cm) and lowest water-use efficiency (4.02 kg ha-1 mm-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–470 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous submergence without weeding had the lowest water-use efficiency, 4.02 kg ha-1 mm-1.

Taxon
hybrid riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
Continuous submergence with unweeded controle0
Outcome
water-use efficiencye0
Direction
loweste0
Value
4.02 kg ha-1 mm-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Continuous submergence with unweeded control consumed maximum water (153 cm) and lowest water-use efficiency (4.02 kg ha-1 mm-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–470 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation three days after ponded water disappeared with weed-free management maximized water-use efficiency at 16.31 kg ha-1mm-1.

Taxon
hybrid riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
irrigation (5 cm) at 3 days after disappearance of ponded water with weed free checke0
Outcome
water-use efficiencye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
16.31 kg ha-1mm-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation (5 cm) at 3 days after disappearance of ponded water with weed free check gave the maximum water-use efficiency (16.31 kg ha-1mm-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–621 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous submergence with weed-free management gave the maximum net return, Rs.33,565 ha-1.

Taxon
hybrid riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
continuous submergence with weed free checke0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs.33,565 ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum net return (Rs.33,565 ha-1) was obtained under continuous submergence with weed free check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–724 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous submergence with pre-emergence Pyrazosulfuron ethyl produced the highest benefit-cost ratio, 1.94.

Taxon
hybrid riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
continuous submergence with pre-emergence application of Pyrazosulfuron ethyl 10% WP @ 25 g ha-1 at 7 days after transplantinge0
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.94e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the benefit: cost ratio (1.94) was highest under continuous submergence with pre-emergence application of Pyrazosulfuron ethyl 10% WP @ 25 g ha-1 at 7 days after transplanting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑

Pyrazosulfuron-ethyl · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 73 positive, 4 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

herbicide · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

flooding · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 24 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

flooding · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

286 papers: 193 positive, 93 negative or no effect

192 papers in the same direction as this paper · 82 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Among field water tube regimes, T6 was superior for yield.

    Water Saving through Field Water Tubes in Transplanted Rice (Oryza sativa L.) · 2018 · compared with four treatments with field water tubes

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. negative
  3. negative

282 papers more in this group

See all 286 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

380 papers: 350 positive, 30 negative or no effect

349 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

724 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

798 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1,074 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.