Abstract
[Objective] The research aimed to discuss the effect of seeding rate,fertilizer and its dosage and seeding method on the growth of Vicia sativa L.and Vicia villosa Roth.[Method] With seedling density,seedling height,branching amount and yield of the 2 crops as indices,the orthogonal test was designed to survey the effect of three factors on the growth of the two.[Result] The effect of seeding rate on the seedling density of Vicia sativa L.and Vicia villosa Roth was significant,while that on the yield,seedling height and branching amount of the two crops was not significant.The effect of kinds of fertilizers and their dosage and mixed seeding on the growth of Vicia sativa L.and Vicia villosa Roth was also not significant.[Conclusion] The effect of each factor on the growth of the two crops was not coincident.Basing on the yield and cost,Vicia sativa L.was the optimum variety.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Seeding rate significantly affected seedling density of Vicia sativa.
- Taxon
- Vicia sativa L.
_Vicia_sativa.jpg?width=60)
Vicia sativae0 - Treatment
- seeding ratee0
- Outcome
- seedling densitye0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Vicia_sativa.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The effect of seeding rate on the seedling density of Vicia sativa L.and Vicia villosa Roth was significant”
Claim · model-written summary
Seeding rate significantly affected seedling density of Vicia villosa.
- Taxon
- Vicia villosa Roth
Vicia villosae0 - Treatment
- seeding ratee0
- Outcome
- seedling densitye0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of seeding rate on the seedling density of Vicia sativa L.and Vicia villosa Roth was significant”
Claim · model-written summary
Seeding rate had no significant effect on yield, height or branching in Vicia sativa.
- Taxon
- Vicia sativa L.Vicia sativat0
- Treatment
- seeding ratee1
- Outcome
- yield,seedling height and branching amounte0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Vicia sativa L.”
e0“while that on the yield,seedling height and branching amount of the two crops was not significant.”
e1“The effect of seeding rate on the seedling density of Vicia sativa L.and Vicia villosa Roth was significant”
Claim · model-written summary
Seeding rate had no significant effect on yield, height or branching in Vicia villosa.
- Taxon
- Vicia villosa RothVicia villosat0
- Treatment
- seeding ratee1
- Outcome
- yield,seedling height and branching amounte0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Vicia villosa Roth”
e0“while that on the yield,seedling height and branching amount of the two crops was not significant.”
e1“The effect of seeding rate on the seedling density of Vicia sativa L.and Vicia villosa Roth was significant”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer type and dosage had no significant growth effect on Vicia sativa.
- Taxon
- Vicia sativa L.Vicia sativae0
- Treatment
- kinds of fertilizers and their dosagee0
- Outcome
- growthe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of kinds of fertilizers and their dosage and mixed seeding on the growth of Vicia sativa L.and Vicia villosa Roth was also not significant.”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer type and dosage had no significant growth effect on Vicia villosa.
- Taxon
- Vicia villosa RothVicia villosae0
- Treatment
- kinds of fertilizers and their dosagee0
- Outcome
- growthe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of kinds of fertilizers and their dosage and mixed seeding on the growth of Vicia sativa L.and Vicia villosa Roth was also not significant.”
Claim · model-written summary
Mixed seeding had no significant growth effect on Vicia sativa.
- Taxon
- Vicia sativa L.Vicia sativae0
- Treatment
- mixed seedinge0
- Outcome
- growthe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of kinds of fertilizers and their dosage and mixed seeding on the growth of Vicia sativa L.and Vicia villosa Roth was also not significant.”
Claim · model-written summary
Mixed seeding had no significant growth effect on Vicia villosa.
- Taxon
- Vicia villosa RothVicia villosae0
- Treatment
- mixed seedinge0
- Outcome
- growthe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of kinds of fertilizers and their dosage and mixed seeding on the growth of Vicia sativa L.and Vicia villosa Roth was also not significant.”
Claim · model-written summary
Vicia sativa was preferred based on yield and cost.
- Taxon
- Vicia sativa L.Vicia sativae0
- Outcome
- optimum varietye0
- Qualifier
- yield and coste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Basing on the yield and cost,Vicia sativa L.was the optimum variety.”
The same questions in other papers
density · yield · Vicia villosa (hairy vetch)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
fertilization · growth · Vicia sativa (common vetch)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
density · yield · Vicia sativa (common vetch)Positive and negative results
5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.