Paper · 1995 · Agronomy Journal

Dry Matter and Seed Yield of Mediterranean Annual Legume Species

Pasquale Martiniello; Antonio Ciola

14
claims
23
verbatim quotes
23
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Knowledge of the effects of seeding rate, irrigation, and forage harvest management on annual legume crops is essential for their proper agronomical exploitation. Cultivars and ecotypes of berseem clover ( Trifolium alexandrinum L.), common vetch ( Vicia sativa L.), and fieldbean ( Vicia faba L.) were compared at two seeding rates, with and without irrigation, and under two harvest managements. These experiments were conducted in Foggia (southern Italy) during 1990 and 1991. Irrigation increased and stabilized forage and seed production reducing the consequences of erratic rainfall. Mean dry matter and seed yield increases due to irrigation were, respectively: 26 and 14% in common vetch, 25 and 9% in field‐bean, and 24 and 28% in berseem clover. Berseem clover showed an increase of 48% in seed yield with forage harvest management under irrigation. Seeding rate interacted mainly with irrigation treatment and length of vegetative period. The high seeding rate under irrigation in common vetch and field‐bean increased forage production more than seed yield. The herbage and seed yield components that responded to the high seeding rate under irrigation were plant height, stems per square meter for all legumes, pods per stem, and seeds per pod for field‐bean and common vetch, and heads per stem and seeds per head for berseem. Adapted varieties and ecotypes identified within each species represent genotypes with superior genetic potential for dry matter production and seed yield under a Mediterranean environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased common vetch dry matter yield by 26%.

Taxon
common vetchVicia sativae0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
increasese0
Value
26e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia sativa
Vicia sativa · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean dry matter and seed yield increases due to irrigation were, respectively: 26 and 14% in common vetch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–704 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased common vetch seed yield by 14%.

Taxon
common vetchVicia sativae0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
14%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia sativa
Vicia sativa · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean dry matter and seed yield increases due to irrigation were, respectively: 26 and 14% in common vetch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–704 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased field-bean dry matter yield by 25%.

Taxon
field‐beane0
Treatment
irrigatione1
Outcome
dry mattere1
Direction
increasese1
Value
25e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“25 and 9% in field‐bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–729 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mean dry matter and seed yield increases due to irrigation were, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased field-bean seed yield by 9%.

Taxon
field‐beane0
Treatment
irrigatione1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
increasese1
Value
9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“25 and 9% in field‐bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–729 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mean dry matter and seed yield increases due to irrigation were, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased berseem clover dry matter yield by 24%.

Taxon
berseem clovere0
Treatment
irrigatione1
Outcome
dry mattere1
Direction
increasese1
Value
24e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“24 and 28% in berseem clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–763 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mean dry matter and seed yield increases due to irrigation were, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased berseem clover seed yield by 28%.

Taxon
berseem clovere0
Treatment
irrigatione1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
increasese1
Value
28%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“24 and 28% in berseem clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–763 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mean dry matter and seed yield increases due to irrigation were, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage harvest management under irrigation increased berseem clover seed yield by 48%.

Taxon
Berseem clovere0
Treatment
forage harvest managemente0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
48%e0
Qualifier
under irrigatione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Berseem clover showed an increase of 48% in seed yield with forage harvest management under irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–867 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased and stabilized forage and seed production.

Taxon
annual legume cropse1
Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
forage and seed productione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
erratic rainfalle0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation increased and stabilized forage and seed production reducing the consequences of erratic rainfall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–597 · show in text ↑
e1

“annual legume crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–115 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeding rate interacted with irrigation and vegetative period length.

Taxon
annual legume cropse1
Treatment
irrigation treatmente0
Outcome
Seeding ratee0
Qualifier
length of vegetative periode0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Seeding rate interacted mainly with irrigation treatment and length of vegetative period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–957 · show in text ↑
e1

“annual legume crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under irrigation, the high seeding rate increased forage production more than seed yield in common vetch and field-bean.

Taxon
common vetch and field‐beane0
Treatment
high seeding ratee0
Outcome
forage productione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
under irrigatione0
Comparator
seed yielde0

Verbatim

e0

“The high seeding rate under irrigation in common vetch and field‐bean increased forage production more than seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High seeding rate under irrigation affected plant height and stems per square meter in the legumes.

Taxon
all legumese0
Treatment
high seeding ratee0
Outcome
plant height, stems per square metere0
Qualifier
under irrigatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The herbage and seed yield components that responded to the high seeding rate under irrigation were plant height, stems per square meter for all legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1231 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High seeding rate under irrigation affected pods per stem and seeds per pod in field-bean and common vetch.

Taxon
field‐bean and common vetche0
Treatment
high seeding ratee1
Outcome
pods per stem, and seeds per pode0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“pods per stem, and seeds per pod for field‐bean and common vetch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1297 · show in text ↑
e1

“components that responded to the high seeding rate under irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High seeding rate under irrigation affected heads per stem and seeds per head in berseem.

Taxon
berseeme0
Treatment
high seeding ratee1
Outcome
heads per stem and seeds per heade0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“heads per stem and seeds per head for berseem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1348 · show in text ↑
e1

“components that responded to the high seeding rate under irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1173 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adapted varieties and ecotypes with superior dry matter and seed yield potential were identified within each species.

Taxon
annual legume cropse1
Material
Adapted varieties and ecotypese0
Outcome
dry matter production and seed yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Setting
Mediterranean environmente0

Verbatim

e0

“Adapted varieties and ecotypes identified within each species represent genotypes with superior genetic potential for dry matter production and seed yield under a Mediterranean environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1538 · show in text ↑
e1

“annual legume crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–115 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Vicia sativa (common vetch)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 22 positive, 13 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

density · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 58 positive, 23 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

irrigation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

122 papers: 87 positive, 35 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

118 papers more in this group

See all 122 papers →

irrigation · yield · Vicia sativa (common vetch)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

irrigation · growth · Vicia sativa (common vetch)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.