Paper · 2004 · Journal of research

Effectivity of wax and fungicides on the storage behaviour of seal packaged kinnow mandarins

Harminder Kaur; J. S. Randhawa; Ajmer Singh Dhatt

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Kinnow fruits were harvested in the mid-January and seal packed individually in HDPE film after giving dip treatments with Stayfresh (a commercial wax emulsion) and fungicides. The observations on physico-chemical characteristics of the fruits were recorded after 30 and 60 days of ambient storage. Physiological loss in weight was minimum in Stayfresh+Derosal 2000 ppm+HDPE. However, this treatment resulted in higher percentage of rotting and low palatibility rating of the fruits. Pathological rotting was better checked by Imazalil 1000 ppm +HDPE after 60 days of storage. Maximum rotting and deterioration of the fruit quality was observed in unwrapped fruits even after coating with wax and/or fungicides. The best treatment was Imazalil 1000 ppm with HDPE film wrapping in which fruit appearance, quality and taste retention was better in addition to low rate of pathological rotting.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stayfresh plus Derosal and HDPE minimized physiological weight loss.

Taxon
kinnow mandarinst0
Treatment
Stayfresh+Derosal 2000 ppm+HDPEe0
Outcome
Physiological loss in weighte0
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Physiological loss in weight was minimum in Stayfresh+Derosal 2000 ppm+HDPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–374 · show in text ↑
t0

“kinnow mandarins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That treatment produced higher rotting.

Taxon
kinnow mandarinst0
Treatment
this treatmente0
Outcome
percentage of rottinge0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“However, this treatment resulted in higher percentage of rotting and low palatibility rating of the fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–482 · show in text ↑
t0

“kinnow mandarins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That treatment produced a low palatability rating.

Taxon
kinnow mandarinst0
Treatment
this treatmente0
Outcome
palatibility ratinge0
Direction
lowe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“this treatment resulted in higher percentage of rotting and low palatibility rating of the fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–482 · show in text ↑
t0

“kinnow mandarins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazalil with HDPE better controlled pathological rotting after 60 days.

Taxon
kinnow mandarinst0
Treatment
Imazalil 1000 ppm +HDPEe0
Outcome
Pathological rottinge0
Direction
better checkede0
Qualifier
after 60 days of storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Pathological rotting was better checked by Imazalil 1000 ppm +HDPE after 60 days of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–575 · show in text ↑
t0

“kinnow mandarins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unwrapped fruit showed maximum rotting and quality deterioration.

Taxon
kinnow mandarinst0
Treatment
unwrapped fruitse0
Outcome
rotting and deterioration of the fruit qualitye0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum rotting and deterioration of the fruit quality was observed in unwrapped fruits even after coating with wax and/or fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“kinnow mandarins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazalil with HDPE retained appearance, quality and taste better while rotting remained low.

Taxon
kinnow mandarinst0
Outcome
Imazalil 1000 ppm with HDPE film wrappinge0

Verbatim

e0

“The best treatment was Imazalil 1000 ppm with HDPE film wrapping in which fruit appearance, quality and taste retention was better in addition to low rate of pathological rotting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“kinnow mandarins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑

enilconazole · disease · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.