Paper · 2015 · Annals of Horticulture

Flower and corm production in gladiolus (Gladiolus hybridus Hort.) cv. "Peater pears" as influenced by different nutrients sources

Mukesh Kumar

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The present investigation entitled, Flower and corm production in gladiolus (Gladiolus hybridus Hort.) as influenced by different sources of nutrients at Horticultural Research Centre (HRC) of SVPUAT, Meerut during the year 2013–14. The experiment laid out in Randomized Block Design (RED) with three replications. The experiment consisted often treatments viz. T1: control (with out NPK), T2: 100% RDF (180:80:80 kg/ha NPK), T3: 75% RDF + 25% VC, T4: 75% RDF+ 25% VC + 2.0 g/plant Azospirillum + 2.0 g/plant PSB, T5: 75% RDF + 25% Leaf Mould, T6: 75% RDF + 25% Leaf Mould + 2.0 g/plant Azospirillum. + 2.0 g/plant PSB, T7: 75% RDF + 25% Neem Cake, T8: 75% RDF + 25% Neem Cake + 2.0 g/plant Azospirillum + 2.0/plant PSB, T9: 50% RDF + 50% VC, TID: 50% RDF + 50% VC + 2.0 g/plant Azospirillum + 2.0 g/plant PSB, Til: 50% RDF + 50% Neem Cake + 2.0 g/plant Azospirillum + 2.0 g/plant PSB, Til:50% RDF + 50% Leaf Mould + 2.0 g/plant Azospirillum.+ 2.0 g/plant PSB. Results revealed that using 50% RDF + 50% VC + 2.0 g/plant Azospirillum + 2.0 g/plant PSB, produced maximum number of florets, number of spikes per corm, diameter of flower, number of cormlets per plant while maximum length of spike and rachis was produced by T10 treatment. However maximum diameter of spike noted with treatment Til. Plant receiving 75% RDF+ 25% VC + 2.0 g/plant Azospirillum + 2.0 g/plant PSB, significantly produced maximum number of spikes/corm, diameter of flower and number of bulblets/plant while treatment T10 and T8 significantly gave maximum number of corms/plant and diameter of bulb respectively. Treatment T9 when plants were treated with 50% RDF + 50% VC, significantly found superior in terms of weight of bulbs and yield of bulbs/plant over control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% RDF and 50% VC treatment with Azospirillum and PSB produced maximum florets, spikes per corm, and flower diameter.

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
50% RDF + 50% VC + 2.0 g/plant Azospirillum + 2.0 g/plant PSBe0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
number of florets, number of spikes per corm, diameter of flowere0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using 50% RDF + 50% VC + 2.0 g/plant Azospirillum + 2.0 g/plant PSB, produced maximum number of florets, number of spikes per corm, diameter of flower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1133 · show in text ↑
t0

“gladiolus (Gladiolus hybridus Hort.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment produced the maximum number of cormlets per plant.

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
50% RDF + 50% VC + 2.0 g/plant Azospirillum + 2.0 g/plant PSBe0
Outcome
number of cormlets per plante0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using 50% RDF + 50% VC + 2.0 g/plant Azospirillum + 2.0 g/plant PSB, produced maximum number of florets, number of spikes per corm, diameter of flower, number of cormlets per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“gladiolus (Gladiolus hybridus Hort.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T10 produced maximum spike and rachis lengths.

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
T10 treatmente0
Outcome
length of spike and rachise0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum length of spike and rachis was produced by T10 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1234 · show in text ↑
t0

“gladiolus (Gladiolus hybridus Hort.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Til gave maximum spike diameter.

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
treatment Tile0
Outcome
diameter of spikee0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum diameter of spike noted with treatment Til”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1294 · show in text ↑
t0

“gladiolus (Gladiolus hybridus Hort.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF and 25% VC treatment with Azospirillum and PSB significantly maximized spikes per corm, flower diameter, and bulblets per plant.

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
75% RDF+ 25% VC + 2.0 g/plant Azospirillum + 2.0 g/plant PSBe0
Outcome
number of spikes/corm, diameter of flower and number of bulblets/plante0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“75% RDF+ 25% VC + 2.0 g/plant Azospirillum + 2.0 g/plant PSB, significantly produced maximum number of spikes/corm, diameter of flower and number of bulblets/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“gladiolus (Gladiolus hybridus Hort.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T10 significantly maximized corms per plant.

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
T10e0
Outcome
number of corms/plante0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment T10 and T8 significantly gave maximum number of corms/plant and diameter of bulb respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1585 · show in text ↑
t0

“gladiolus (Gladiolus hybridus Hort.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 significantly maximized bulb diameter.

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
T8e0
Outcome
diameter of bulbe0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment T10 and T8 significantly gave maximum number of corms/plant and diameter of bulb respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1585 · show in text ↑
t0

“gladiolus (Gladiolus hybridus Hort.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 significantly improved bulb weight and yield per plant over control.

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
50% RDF + 50% VCe0
Outcome
weight of bulbs and yield of bulbs/plante0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment T9 when plants were treated with 50% RDF + 50% VC, significantly found superior in terms of weight of bulbs and yield of bulbs/plant over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1587–1742 · show in text ↑
t0

“gladiolus (Gladiolus hybridus Hort.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–66 · show in text ↑

Azospirillum · yield · GladiolusResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · yield · GladiolusPositive and negative results

53 papers: 52 positive, 1 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.