Paper · 2007 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Effect of spent mushroom substrate on yield and quality of capsicum

O P Ahlawat; M.P. Sagar; Dev Raj; et al.

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Spent mushroom substrate (SMS) recomposted by different methods and of different age was mixed in arable soil and its effect was evaluated on vegetative growth, yield and quality attributes of capsicum (Capsicum annuum). Results elucidated that naturally weathered spent mushroom substrate of 6 to 24 months age enhanced the vegetative growth, yield and quality of capsicum and the effect was at par with recommended dose of fertilizers. Aerobically recomposted SMS of 12 months age also resulted in significant enhancement in yield and quality attributes of capsicum fruits along with reduced incidence level of grasshopper, chilli veinal mottle virus and fruit rotting microbes on both capsicum plants and fruits. So the use of aerobically recomposted SMS for capsicum cultivation was found to be a better option of spent mushroom substrate disposal and to raise organic crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Naturally weathered substrate aged 6 to 24 months enhanced capsicum vegetative growth, yield and quality.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicume0
Treatment
naturally weathered spent mushroom substrate of 6 to 24 months agee0
Outcome
vegetative growth, yield and qualitye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“naturally weathered spent mushroom substrate of 6 to 24 months age enhanced the vegetative growth, yield and quality of capsicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–373 · show in text ↑
e1

“capsicum (Capsicum annuum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–219 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effect of naturally weathered substrate was at par with recommended fertilizer dose.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicume1
Treatment
naturally weathered spent mushroom substrate of 6 to 24 months agee1
Outcome
effecte0
Comparator
recommended dose of fertilizerse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect was at par with recommended dose of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–436 · show in text ↑
e1

“naturally weathered spent mushroom substrate of 6 to 24 months age enhanced the vegetative growth, yield and quality of capsicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aerobically recomposted substrate aged 12 months significantly increased capsicum fruit yield and quality.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicume0
Treatment
Aerobically recomposted SMS of 12 months agee0
Outcome
yield and quality attributes of capsicum fruitse0
Direction
enhancemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aerobically recomposted SMS of 12 months age also resulted in significant enhancement in yield and quality attributes of capsicum fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–574 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aerobically recomposted substrate reduced grasshopper incidence.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicume0
Treatment
Aerobically recomposted SMS of 12 months agee0
Interactor
grasshoppere0pest
Outcome
incidence level of grasshoppere0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aerobically recomposted SMS of 12 months age also resulted in significant enhancement in yield and quality attributes of capsicum fruits along with reduced incidence level of grasshopper, chilli veinal mottle virus and fruit rotting microbes on both capsicum plants and fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–714 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aerobically recomposted substrate reduced chilli veinal mottle virus incidence.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicume0
Treatment
Aerobically recomposted SMS of 12 months agee0
Interactor
chilli veinal mottle virusChilli veinal mottle viruse0pathogen
Outcome
incidence level of grasshopper, chilli veinal mottle virus and fruit rotting microbese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aerobically recomposted SMS of 12 months age also resulted in significant enhancement in yield and quality attributes of capsicum fruits along with reduced incidence level of grasshopper, chilli veinal mottle virus and fruit rotting microbes on both capsicum plants and fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–714 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aerobically recomposted substrate reduced fruit-rotting microbe incidence.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicume0
Treatment
Aerobically recomposted SMS of 12 months agee0
Interactor
fruit rotting microbese0pathogen
Outcome
incidence level of grasshopper, chilli veinal mottle virus and fruit rotting microbese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aerobically recomposted SMS of 12 months age also resulted in significant enhancement in yield and quality attributes of capsicum fruits along with reduced incidence level of grasshopper, chilli veinal mottle virus and fruit rotting microbes on both capsicum plants and fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–714 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend aerobically recomposted SMS for organic capsicum cultivation and substrate disposal.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicume0
Outcome
use of aerobically recomposted SMS for capsicum cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of aerobically recomposted SMS for capsicum cultivation was found to be a better option of spent mushroom substrate disposal and to raise organic crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–878 · show in text ↑

growing medium · quality: general · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

growing medium · disease · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.